Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
(version: 0)
dfgdfgdgdgdg
Comparing performance of:
dfggdgdgdg vs dfghdfghtgedrfgdgdrtge
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
dfggdgdgdg
let number = 14; let primes = []; let NonPrimes = []; let isPrime; // Hard coded values primes[0]=2; primes[1]=3; for(let p=5; p<=number; p+=2) { isPrime = true; for(let c=1;p/primes[c]>=primes[c]; c++){ if(p % primes[c] === 0) isPrime = false; } if(isPrime === true) primes[primes.length]=p; else{ NonPrimes[NonPrimes.length]= p;} } console.log('primes=',primes); console.log('Non primes=',NonPrimes);
dfghdfghtgedrfgdgdrtge
let number = 14; let primes = []; let NonPrimes = []; let isPrime; // Hard coded values primes[0]=2; primes[1]=3; for(let p=5; p<=number; p+=2) { isPrime = true; for(let c=1;p/primes[c]>=primes[c]; c++){ if(p % primes[c] === 0) isPrime = false; break; } if(isPrime === true) primes[primes.length]=p; else{ NonPrimes[NonPrimes.length]= p;} } console.log('primes=',primes); console.log('Non primes=',NonPrimes);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
dfggdgdgdg
dfghdfghtgedrfgdgdrtge
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the provided JSON and benchmark preparation code. **Benchmark Definition** The `Benchmark Definition` section defines the script that will be executed for each test case. In this case, it's a JavaScript snippet that finds prime numbers up to a given number (`number = 14`). The script uses two arrays: `primes` to store prime numbers and `NonPrimes` to store non-prime numbers. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **dfggdgdgdg**: This test case has no modifications compared to the original code. 2. **dfghdfghtgedrfgdgdrtge**: This test case is identical to the first one, with a minor difference: an additional `break` statement in the inner loop. **Latest Benchmark Result** The latest benchmark result section shows the execution performance of each test case on a Firefox 87 browser on Windows Desktop. The results are: 1. **dfggdgdgdg**: 28647.501953125 executions per second 2. **dfghdfghtgedrfgdgdrtge**: 28439.41796875 executions per second **What's being compared?** The two test cases, **dfggdgdgdg** and **dfghdfghtgedrfgdgdrtge**, are identical in terms of the algorithm used to find prime numbers. The only difference is the addition of a `break` statement in the inner loop for the second test case. In essence, we're comparing two different ways to write the same code: 1. Without the `break` statement 2. With the `break` statement **Pros/Cons and Considerations** The addition of the `break` statement in the second test case might seem like a minor change, but it can have significant implications on code performance. The original code without the `break` statement has to iterate through all prime numbers up to `primes[c]` before concluding whether `p` is prime or not. With the `break` statement, we short-circuit the loop as soon as we find a divisor of `p`. In terms of pros and cons: Pros (second test case with `break`): * Improved performance due to early exit from the loop * Reduced number of iterations Cons: * Potential for code readability issues if the break condition is not clearly indicated * Might lead to false positives or negatives in some edge cases, depending on how the algorithm is implemented Other considerations: * The difference in execution performance might be negligible for small input sizes (like `number = 14`), but could become significant for larger inputs. * The choice between using a `break` statement and not using it depends on personal preference, coding style, and specific use case requirements. **Library Used** No libraries are used in this benchmark. The code is written solely in JavaScript, with no external dependencies or frameworks involved. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this code that requires explanation. The code uses standard JavaScript constructs like `for` loops, conditional statements (`if`), and array manipulation.
Related benchmarks:
testje
Performance Test: substring vs slice vs split
test dv vs fm real
fjdfjdu34uerh
dfjf2hdshsdrh
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?