Benchmark: dfjf2hdshsdrh - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var JONG_HANGUL = [
  '', 'ㄱ', 'ㄲ', 'ㄳ', 'ㄴ', 'ㄵ', 'ㄶ', 
  'ㄷ', 'ㄹ', 'ㄺ', 'ㄻ', 'ㄼ', 'ㄽ', 'ㄾ', 
  'ㄿ', 'ㅀ', 'ㅁ', 'ㅂ', 'ㅄ', 'ㅅ', 'ㅆ', 
  'ㅇ', 'ㅈ', 'ㅊ', 'ㅋ', 'ㅌ', 'ㅍ','ㅎ',
];

Tests:

[10]d
({ "": 0, "ㄱ": 1, "ㄲ": 2, "ㄳ": 3, "ㄴ": 4, "ㄵ": 5, "ㄶ": 6, "ㄷ": 7, "ㄹ": 8, "ㄺ": 9, "ㄻ": 10, "ㄼ": 11, "ㄽ": 12, "ㄾ": 13, "ㄿ": 14, "ㅀ": 15, "ㅁ": 16, "ㅂ": 17, "ㅄ": 18, "ㅅ": 19, "ㅆ": 20, "ㅇ": 21, "ㅈ": 22, "ㅊ": 23, "ㅋ": 24, "ㅌ": 25, "ㅍ": 26, "ㅎ": 27 })['ㅂ'];
shshdsh
JONG_HANGUL.indexOf('ㅂ') !== -1

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
[10]d
shshdsh

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided benchmark is designed to measure the performance of JavaScript's string operations, specifically looking at the indexing and searching capabilities of strings.

**Options Compared**

There are two test cases:

1. `dfjf2hdshsdrh`: This test case measures the time it takes to access an element in a large object using bracket notation (`object[key]`).
2. `shshdsh`: This test case measures the time it takes for the browser's `indexOf` method to find a specific character within a Unicode string.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Bracket Notation (`[]`)**
	* Pros: Fast, efficient, and widely supported.
	* Cons: May not be as readable or maintainable, especially for large objects.
2. **`indexOf` Method**
	* Pros: Easy to understand, widely used, and well-supported by browsers.
	* Cons: Can be slower than bracket notation, especially for very large strings.

**Library and Syntax**

In the `dfjf2hdshsdrh` test case, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, it appears to use a custom object with Unicode characters as keys. The script preparation code defines an array (`JONG_HANGUL`) containing Unicode characters, which is then used in the benchmark.

The `shshdsh` test case uses the browser's built-in `indexOf` method, which is a standard JavaScript API.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

For similar benchmarks, you might consider:

1. Measuring the performance of other string operations, such as `slice`, `substring`, or `replace`.
2. Comparing the performance of different data structures, such as arrays versus objects.
3. Evaluating the impact of various optimizations, such as caching or memoization.

Keep in mind that the choice of benchmark and options will depend on the specific requirements and goals of your project.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines an array `JONG_HANGUL` containing Unicode characters:
```javascript
var JONG_HANGUL = [
  '',
  'ㄱ',
  'ㄲ',
  'ㄳ',
  'ㄴ',
  'ㄵ',
  'ㄶ',
  'ㄷ',
  'ㄹ',
  'ㄺ',
  'ㄻ',
  'ㄼ',
  'ㄽ',
  'ㄾ',
  'ㄿ',
  'ㅀ',
  'ㅁ',
  'ㅂ',
  'ㅄ',
  'ㅅ',
  'ㅆ',
  'ㅇ',
  'ㅈ',
  'ㅊ',
  'ㅋ',
  'ㅌ',
  'ㅍ',
  'ㅎ'
];
```
This array is used in the `dfjf2hdshsdrh` test case to create a large object with Unicode characters as keys.

Related benchmarks:

dfjf2hdshsdrh (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: [10]d vs shshdsh

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

[10]d

shshdsh

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):