Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Luxon vs Moment Common Operations Benchmark Individual Latest
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Luxon now vs Moment now vs Luxon Epoch vs Moment Epoch vs Luxon ISO8601 vs Moment ISO8601 vs Luxon Diff vs Moment Diff
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/moment@2/moment.min.js"></script> </script>
Tests:
Luxon now
luxon.DateTime.now();
Moment now
moment();
Luxon Epoch
luxon.DateTime.now().valueOf();
Moment Epoch
moment().valueOf();
Luxon ISO8601
luxon.DateTime.now().toISO();
Moment ISO8601
moment().toISOString();
Luxon Diff
luxon.DateTime.now().diff(luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00")).as("milliseconds");
Moment Diff
moment.duration(moment().diff(moment("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00"))).as("milliseconds");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (8)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Luxon now
Moment now
Luxon Epoch
Moment Epoch
Luxon ISO8601
Moment ISO8601
Luxon Diff
Moment Diff
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks! **What is being tested?** The provided benchmark tests the performance of two popular JavaScript date and time libraries: Luxon and Moment.js. The benchmarks focus on various common operations, such as: 1. Getting the current date and time (now) 2. Converting to epoch time (valueOf) 3. Formatting dates in ISO 8601 format (toISO) 4. Calculating differences between two dates **Options being compared** The benchmarks compare the performance of Luxon and Moment.js for each operation. **Pros and Cons of different approaches:** * **Luxon**: Pros: + More modern and actively maintained library + Supports more advanced features, such as parsing ISO 8601 dates + Has better support for internationalization and localization * Cons: + May have a steeper learning curve due to its modern API + Some users might find it too complex or verbose * **Moment.js**: Pros: + Widely adopted and supported by many developers + Easier to learn and use, especially for those familiar with jQuery + Has a larger community of users and contributors * Cons: + Less modern and less actively maintained than Luxon + Limited support for advanced features, such as parsing ISO 8601 dates **Library usage** * **Luxon**: The library is used in the `luxon.DateTime.now()` calls. Luxon is a more modern date and time library that provides a simple and intuitive API. * **Moment.js**: The library is used in the `moment()` and `moment.duration()` calls. Moment.js is a widely adopted and well-known date and time library. **Special JS features or syntax** None of the benchmarks use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's typically found in modern browsers. **Other alternatives** If you're considering alternative libraries for date and time manipulation, some popular options include: * **Date-fns**: A lightweight and easy-to-use library that provides a simple API for working with dates. * **Day.js**: A fast and efficient library that provides a simple API for working with dates and times. Keep in mind that the choice of library ultimately depends on your project's specific needs, your team's expertise, and personal preferences.
Related benchmarks:
Luxon vs Moment Common Operations Benchmark
Luxon vs Moment Common Operations Benchmark w/o logging
Luxon vs Moment Common Operations Benchmark Individual
luxon vs moment (UTC)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?