Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Luxon vs Moment Common Operations Benchmark w/o logging
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Luxon vs Moment
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3.0.3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.29.3/moment.min.js'></script> <script src="//unpkg.com/timeago.js"> </script>
Tests:
Luxon
const now = luxon.DateTime.now(); const epoch = now.valueOf(); const iso = now.toISO(); const diff = now.diff(luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00")).as("milliseconds")
Moment
const now = moment(); const epoch = now.valueOf(); const iso = now.toISOString(); const diff = moment.duration(now.diff(moment("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00"))).as("milliseconds")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Luxon
Moment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 123 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Luxon
138842.5 Ops/sec
Moment
84580.1 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is created on MeasureThat.net, which allows users to compare the performance of JavaScript libraries. The benchmark definition provides two test cases: 1. "Luxon" 2. "Moment" **Test Cases** Each test case measures the performance of a specific JavaScript library for common operations: * `luxon` (Luxon): + Creates a new date object using `luxon.DateTime.now()`. + Extracts the epoch timestamp using `now.valueOf()`. + Converts the date to ISO format using `now.toISO()`. + Calculates the difference between two dates using `now.diff(luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00")).as("milliseconds")`. * `moment` (Moment): + Creates a new date object using `moment()` (Note: Moment uses a default constructor, whereas Luxon uses `luxon.DateTime.now()`). + Extracts the epoch timestamp using `now.valueOf()`. + Converts the date to ISO format using `now.toISOString()`. + Calculates the difference between two dates using `moment.duration(now.diff(moment("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00"))).as("milliseconds")`. **Libraries and Their Purposes** 1. **Luxon**: A modern JavaScript library for working with dates, times, and numbers. It provides a more efficient and intuitive API compared to traditional date libraries like Moment. 2. **Moment**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It was widely used before Luxon but has some limitations, such as being less efficient and having a more complex API. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, the options being compared are: * `luxon` vs `moment`: Two different libraries with distinct strengths and weaknesses. * Specific operations: Each library performs similar operations (e.g., date extraction, conversion to ISO format), but might optimize or implement them differently. **Pros and Cons** **Luxon** Pros: * More efficient and modern API * Better support for modern date formats and edge cases * Smaller codebase with fewer dependencies Cons: * Might have a steeper learning curve due to its more functional programming style * Less widely adopted, which could impact community support and resources **Moment** Pros: * Wide adoption and established community support * Well-documented and easy to learn * Good performance for simple date operations Cons: * More complex API with many options and methods * Not as efficient as Luxon for certain operations * Larger codebase with more dependencies **Other Considerations** * Performance: The benchmark results show that `luxon` performs better than `moment` in this specific test case. * Community Support: Moment has a larger community and more resources available, which can be beneficial for developers who prefer its API. * Learning Curve: Luxon's functional programming style might be challenging for developers accustomed to traditional date libraries like Moment. **Alternatives** Other JavaScript libraries that offer date and time functionality include: * **Date-fns**: A lightweight library with a simple and intuitive API. * **Day.js**: A modern library with a focus on ease of use and performance. * **js-joda**: A Java-based library that can be used in JavaScript environments. These alternatives might offer different trade-offs between features, performance, and complexity, depending on the specific needs of your project.
Related benchmarks:
Luxon vs moment
Luxon vs Moment Common Operations Benchmark
Luxon vs Moment Common Operations Benchmark Individual
luxon vs moment (UTC)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?