Benchmark: Luxon vs moment - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@3.0.3/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.29.3/moment.min.js'></script>

Tests:

Luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00");
Moment
moment("2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Luxon
Moment

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 147 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Luxon	424375.7 Ops/sec
Moment	213018.4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll do my best to explain the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript libraries: Luxon and Moment.js. Both libraries are used for date and time manipulation, but they have different approaches and use cases.

**Library Overview**

1. **Luxon**: Luxon is a modern JavaScript library for working with dates and times in a clean, intuitive way. It provides a flexible and powerful API for parsing, formatting, and manipulating dates, including handling timezone offsets.
2. **Moment.js**: Moment.js is another popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It has a large community of users and developers, but its API can be less elegant than Luxon's.

**Test Cases**

The benchmark consists of two test cases:

1. `Luxon`: The first test case uses the Luxon library to parse a date string in ISO format using the `luxon.DateTime.fromISO()` method.
2. `Moment`: The second test case uses the Moment.js library to parse a similar date string using the `moment()` function.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares two approaches:

1. **Luxon's `fromISO()` method**: This method takes a date string in ISO format as input and returns a Luxon `DateTime` object.
2. **Moment.js' `moment()` function**: This function takes a date string in ISO format as input and returns a Moment.js object.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Luxon's `fromISO()` method**:
	* Pros: More flexible and powerful API, better support for timezone offsets.
	* Cons: May be slower than Moment.js due to its more complex parsing logic.
2. **Moment.js' `moment()` function**:
	* Pros: Faster execution times, widely adopted by the community.
	* Cons: Less elegant API, less support for timezone offsets.

**Other Considerations**

1. **Library Maintenance**: Both libraries are actively maintained and updated with new features and bug fixes.
2. **Community Support**: Luxon has a smaller but growing community of developers, while Moment.js has a larger community but also more competition from other libraries.
3. **Licensing**: Both libraries are open-source under the MIT license.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that require explanation beyond what's provided by the libraries themselves.

**Alternatives**

Other popular date and time libraries for JavaScript include:

1. **Date-fns**: A lightweight library with a simple API.
2. **js-joda**: A Java-inspired library for working with dates and times.
3. **Day.js**: Another modern JavaScript library for working with dates and times, similar to Luxon.

Overall, this benchmark provides a good comparison of two popular libraries for date and time manipulation in JavaScript. The results can help developers choose the best library for their specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

Luxon vs moment (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Luxon vs Moment

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Luxon

Moment

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):