Benchmark: lodash vs ramda 1231jdasda

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {
    'a': {
        'b': {
            'c': 1
        }
    }
};

Tests:

Rambda
R.path(['a','b','c'])(obj)
Lodash
_.get(obj, 'a.b.c')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Rambda
Lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of two JavaScript libraries: Lodash and Ramda. Both libraries provide functional programming utilities, but they have different approaches to achieving their goals.

**Test Case 1: Rambda (Ramda)**

The first test case uses the Ramda library to access a nested property in an object. The `R.path(['a','b','c'])(obj)` expression navigates through the object using a path specification, where each index is a string that represents a property name.

**Test Case 2: Lodash**

The second test case uses the Lodash library to access the same nested property in an object. The `_.get(obj, 'a.b.c')` expression also navigates through the object, but it uses a different syntax for specifying the path.

**Library and Purpose**

* **Ramda**: Ramda is a functional programming library that provides a set of immutable data structures and functions for manipulating them. It's designed to be highly expressive and flexible, allowing developers to write concise and composable code.
* **Lodash**: Lodash is another popular JavaScript library that provides a wide range of utility functions for working with arrays, objects, and functions. It's designed to make common programming tasks easier and more efficient.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases are comparing the performance of Ramda's `path` function versus Lodash's `get` function when accessing nested properties in an object. This comparison is interesting because it highlights the differences in approach between these two libraries:

* **Ramda's `path` function**: This function uses a recursive approach to navigate through the object, where each index is a string that represents a property name. This can lead to slower performance for very deep objects.
* **Lodash's `get` function**: This function uses a more traditional object access syntax, where the path is specified as a string separated by dots (`a.b.c`). This approach can be faster for shallow objects but may become slower for deeply nested objects.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Ramda's `path` function**:
	+ Pros: Highly expressive and flexible syntax, suitable for complex data structures.
	+ Cons: May perform poorly for very deep objects due to recursion.
* **Lodash's `get` function**:
	+ Pros: Efficient for shallow objects, easy to use.
	+ Cons: Less expressive than Ramda's syntax, may not be as flexible.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark is run on a desktop device with Chrome 114 browser, which might affect the results due to differences in JavaScript engine optimizations or caching.
* The `ExecutionsPerSecond` metric provides an estimate of how many times each function was executed per second during the test. This can help compare performance between the two libraries.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to Lodash and Ramda, consider:

* **Underscore.js**: Another popular utility library that provides similar functionality to Lodash.
* **Fn**: A lightweight JavaScript library that offers a functional programming API, similar to Ramda.
* **JQuery's `$.object` function**: Although primarily designed for manipulating DOM elements, this function can also be used for working with objects in the browser.

Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own strengths and weaknesses, so it's essential to evaluate them based on your specific project requirements.

Related benchmarks:

lodash vs ramda 1231jdasda (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Rambda vs Lodash

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Rambda

Lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):