Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Ramda vs Lodash vs Native : Remove selected values
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Ramda vs Lodash vs Native
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script> <script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'b', 'c'];
Tests:
Ramda
_.pull(array, 'a', 'c');
Lodash
_.pull(array, 'a', 'c');
Native
array = [...new Set(array)];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Ramda
Lodash
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares the performance of three different approaches to removing specific values from an array: * **Ramda:** Uses the `remove` function from the Ramda library. * **Pros:** Ramda is known for its functional programming style, which can lead to concise and readable code. It often optimizes for performance. * **Cons:** It has a steeper learning curve compared to more mainstream libraries. * **Lodash:** Utilizes the `pull` function from the Lodash library. * **Pros:** Lodash is very popular, well-documented, and offers a wide range of utility functions for working with arrays and other data structures. It's generally easier to learn than Ramda. * **Cons:** While powerful, Lodash can sometimes be less performant than more specialized libraries or native JavaScript implementations for specific tasks. * **Native:** Implements the removal using a combination of `Set` and spread syntax (`...`) in native JavaScript. * **Pros:** Native solutions often have the best performance as they leverage the underlying language's optimizations. They don't add external dependencies. * **Cons:** Writing efficient native JavaScript can sometimes be more complex than using established libraries like Lodash or Ramda. **Considerations:** * **Project Requirements:** If your project heavily relies on functional programming paradigms, Ramda might be a good fit. If you need a wide variety of utility functions and prioritize ease of use, Lodash is a solid choice. * **Performance Needs:** If absolute performance is critical, benchmarking the native approach alongside libraries is essential. In some cases, the native solution might be significantly faster. **Alternatives:** * **Other Libraries:** Explore libraries like Immutable.js if you need immutable data structures or Moment.js for date manipulation. * **Custom Implementation:** If the task is simple enough, you could write your own efficient function to remove values from an array.
Related benchmarks:
lodash includes vs ramda includes
Lodash isEmpty vs native .isArray + length
Lodash vs Ramda vs Native fromPairs
Last element (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?