Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array.length vs array.length > 0 vs !!array.length
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
array length vs array length > 0 vs !! array length
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = [];
Tests:
array length
if (arr.length) { console.log(1); } else { console.log(0); }
array length > 0
if (arr.length > 0) { console.log(1); } else { console.log(0); }
!! array length
if (!!arr.length) { console.log(1); } else { console.log(0); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array length
array length > 0
!! array length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark defines three different ways to check if an array is not empty: 1. `array.length`: This checks if the length of the array is 0 (i.e., the array is empty). 2. `array.length > 0`: This checks if the length of the array is greater than 0 (i.e., the array is not empty, but may contain zeros or empty strings). 3. `!!array.length`: This uses a unary negation operator (`!!`) to check if the length of the array is truthy (i.e., non-zero) or falsy (i.e., zero). **Comparison** The benchmark compares these three approaches in terms of their performance, with the goal of determining which one is the fastest. **Pros and Cons:** 1. `array.length`: * Pros: Simple and straightforward. * Cons: May cause issues if arrays contain non-numeric values or are not properly initialized. 2. `array.length > 0`: * Pros: More robust than `array.length`, as it checks for both positive and zero lengths. * Cons: May be slower due to the comparison operation. 3. `!!array.length`: * Pros: Elegant and concise, leveraging the truthiness of numeric values. * Cons: May surprise some developers who are not familiar with this syntax. **Library Usage** None of the benchmark test cases explicitly use any JavaScript libraries. However, it's worth noting that Chrome 114 is running a modern version of JavaScript (likely ECMAScript 2022 or later), which may enable features like `!!` syntax. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The `!!` syntax is an example of a feature called "short-circuiting" in JavaScript. When used with numeric values, it leverages the fact that `true` and `false` are truthy/falsy values in arithmetic operations. This allows for concise and expressive code. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to this benchmark, here are a few options: 1. Use an array prototype method like `every()` or `some()`, which can simplify the comparison logic. 2. Implement a custom function to check if an array is not empty, allowing for more control over the implementation and potentially better performance. 3. Compare these approaches with other methods that don't rely on array length checks, such as using `JSON.parse()` to convert an array-like object to an actual array. Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
`Array.slice(-1)[0]` vs `Array[Array.length]` for 10000 length
JS array emptiness check
array.splice vs array.length
arr.at(-1) vs arr[arr.length - 1]
array.length = 0 vs []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?