Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test12345
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
unshift vs filter
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = new Array(100);
Tests:
unshift
array.unshift(1)
filter
array.filter(i => !!i)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
unshift
filter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark and its results. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark is used to compare the performance of two different approaches in JavaScript: using `array.unshift(1)` versus `array.filter(i => !!i)`. The benchmark measures the number of executions per second for each approach. **Options Compared** There are only two options being compared: 1. **`array.unshift(1)`**: This method adds a new element to the beginning of an array. 2. **`array.filter(i => !!i)`**: This method creates a new array containing only the elements of the original array for which the provided callback returns `true`. **Pros and Cons** * **`array.unshift(1)`**: * Pros: This approach is generally faster because it modifies the existing array in-place, resulting in less memory allocation and copying. * Cons: It can be less intuitive and more error-prone than other approaches, especially for beginners. Additionally, it requires knowing that `unshift` modifies the original array, which may not be immediately clear to all developers. * **`array.filter(i => !!i)`**: * Pros: This approach is often considered more readable and easier to understand, as it uses a functional programming style. It also avoids modifying the original array, making it safer for use in certain contexts. * Cons: This method creates a new array, which can be slower than modifying an existing array due to memory allocation and copying. **Library** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, `Array.prototype.unshift()` and `Array.prototype.filter()` are built-in methods provided by the JavaScript language itself. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the provided benchmark code uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the trade-offs between speed, readability, and safety. If speed is a critical concern and you're familiar with the potential pitfalls of modifying arrays in-place, `array.unshift(1)` might be a better choice. However, if you prefer a more functional programming style or need to preserve the original array, `array.filter(i => !!i)` is often a safer and more readable option. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for adding elements to an array include: * Using the `push()` method with multiple arguments. * Creating a new array using the `Array` constructor and pushing elements onto it. For filtering arrays, consider using other methods like `map()`, `reduce()`, or even using `Array.prototype.forEach()` in combination with `filter()` (though this is less efficient). These alternatives might offer different performance characteristics, readability benefits, or specific use cases that align better with your project's requirements.
Related benchmarks:
array test
Add value to an array
teststest
teststest1
Array Test 1234
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?