Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
pre-allocated vs variable size
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
pre-allocated
for(var test = new Array(1000), i = 0; i < 1000; i++) test.push(i)
variable size
for(var test = [], i = 0; i < 1000; i++) test.push(i)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
pre-allocated
variable size
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definitions and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Definitions:** The two benchmark definitions are: 1. `"for(var test = new Array(1000), i = 0; i < 1000; i++)\r\n test.push(i)"`: This definition tests the performance of creating an array with a fixed size (1000 elements) and then pushing values into it using a `for` loop. 2. `"for(var test = [], i = 0; i < 1000; i++)\r\n test.push(i)"`: This definition tests the performance of creating an empty array and then dynamically resizing it to accommodate 1000 elements, all while pushing values into it using a `for` loop. **Comparison:** The two benchmarks are comparing the performance differences between: * Creating an array with a fixed size (pre-allocated) vs. creating an empty array and dynamically resizing it to accommodate the required number of elements (variable-size allocation). * The overhead of initializing an array versus not initializing it. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **Pre-allocated Array:** * Pros: + Reduces memory allocation time, as the array is already initialized with a fixed size. + Can lead to better cache locality, potentially improving performance. * Cons: + Requires more initial memory space, which can be a limitation in systems with limited resources. 2. **Variable-Size Allocation:** * Pros: + Allows for more flexibility and adaptability in terms of array size. + Can reduce the overhead of initial memory allocation. * Cons: + May result in slower performance due to the additional time spent on dynamic resizing and memory allocation. **Library and Special JS Features:** There are no libraries or special JavaScript features explicitly mentioned in these benchmark definitions. However, note that JavaScript engines like V8 (used by Chrome) have implemented various optimizations and heuristics to improve array allocation and management performance. **Other Alternatives:** Some alternative approaches to test the performance of array allocation and resizing could include: 1. Testing the creation of arrays with different sizes (e.g., 100, 1000, 10,000). 2. Comparing the performance of using `Array.prototype.push()` versus other methods like `Array.prototype.splice()`. 3. Examining the impact of different array constructors (e.g., `Array()`, `new Int8Array(1000)`) on performance. 4. Investigating the performance differences between using `const` vs. `var` for declaring array variables. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches would require modifying or extending the provided benchmark definitions to accommodate new test cases and scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
array assignment vs array fill
Array isArray vs instanceof vs isEqual vs isLessThan2223
Array mutation VS creation
Populate array: array literal vs array constructor
testando 123 teste
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?