Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
testing regex vs includes ant 1986
(version: 0)
test regex vs includes
Comparing performance of:
one vs two
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
one
/hello/i.test("Hello")
two
'Hello'.toLowerCase().includes('hello')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
one
two
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark explanation for you. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, which are part of a larger benchmarking exercise. The tests aim to compare the performance of JavaScript's regular expression (`regex`) and `includes()` methods on the same string. **Options being compared:** 1. **Regex (`/hello/i.test("Hello")`)**: This method uses a regular expression to search for a pattern in a string. The `/i` flag at the end of the regex indicates that it should be case-insensitive. 2. **Includes (`"Hello".toLowerCase().includes('hello')`)**: This method checks if a substring exists within another string, after converting the original string to lowercase. **Pros and cons of each approach:** 1. **Regex**: * Pros: Regex is highly flexible and can be used for complex pattern matching. * Cons: Regex can be slow due to its interpretive nature and the overhead of parsing the regex. 2. **Includes**: * Pros: Includes is generally faster than regex, as it uses a simple substring search algorithm. * Cons: Includes may not be suitable for complex pattern matching or cases where case sensitivity is important. **Library usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, the `includes()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that uses the String.prototype.includes() function, which is implemented by the browser's engine (e.g., V8 in Chrome). **Special JS features or syntax** The `i` flag in the regex is a special feature that enables case-insensitive matching. It's not a standard feature of regular expressions, but rather an extension supported by some JavaScript engines. **Other considerations** * The benchmarking exercise aims to evaluate the performance difference between these two approaches. * The tests are likely designed to be run multiple times with different inputs and configurations to ensure accurate results. * The use of JSON for describing benchmarks and test cases allows for easy comparison and analysis across multiple test runs. **Alternatives** Some alternative approaches or optimizations could include: * Using a more efficient regex engine, like the `String.prototype.match()` method, which returns an array of matches instead of using the `test()` method. * Implementing a custom substring search algorithm to bypass built-in JavaScript methods and improve performance. * Optimizing the test cases to reduce the number of iterations or use smaller input strings. Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely require significant changes to the benchmarking exercise and may not always lead to improved performance.
Related benchmarks:
RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match insensitive
Case insensitive RegEx.test vs. String.includes when string doesn’t match
RegEx.test (with inline regex) vs. String.includes vs. String.match
regex vs includes - case insensitive
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?