Benchmark: regex vs includes - case insensitive

Script Preparation code:

var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /hello/i;
var search = "hello";

Tests:

regex
regex.test(string);
includes
string.toUpperCase().includes(search.toUpperCase());

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
regex
includes

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 136 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

includes

2834.4M/s

regex

56.4M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ includes	2,834,428,672 Ops/sec
regex	56,393,596 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark on MeasureThat.net, which compares the performance of regular expressions (regex) and the `includes` method in case-insensitive searches.

**Tested Options**

There are two test cases:

1. **Regex**: The first test case uses a regular expression (`/hello/i;`) to search for the string "hello" (case-insensitive).
2. **Includes**: The second test case uses the `toUpperCase()` method followed by the `includes()` method to search for the uppercase version of the string "hello".

**Pros and Cons**

* **Regex:**
	+ Pros:
		- Can be used for complex pattern matching.
		- Provides more control over the search process.
	+ Cons:
		- Can be slower due to the complexity of the pattern.
		- May require additional processing steps (e.g., escaping special characters).
* **Includes:**
	+ Pros:
		- Generally faster than regex for simple string matching.
		- More concise and readable code.
	+ Cons:
		- Limited control over the search process.
		- Requires the `toUpperCase()` method, which can introduce additional processing steps.

**Library Usage**

In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, the `includes` method is a built-in JavaScript method that is widely supported across browsers and platforms.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

This benchmark uses:

* **Case-insensitive search**: The `/hello/i;` regex pattern and the `.toUpperCase()` method with `includes()` use case-insensitive searching.
* **Browser-specific details**: The provided JSON includes information about the browser (Chrome 123) and device platform (Desktop), which can affect performance.

**Other Alternatives**

If you wanted to test alternative approaches, you could consider adding additional test cases for:

* **String manipulation libraries**: Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js to perform string matching.
* **Regular expression alternatives**: Testing the `startsWith()` and `endsWith()` methods instead of regex.
* **Other search algorithms**: Exploring more complex algorithms, such as Boyer-Moore or Knuth-Morris-Pratt.

These alternative approaches could provide additional insights into performance differences between various techniques.

regex vs includes - case insensitive (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `regex vs includes`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

regex

includes

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

regex vs includes - case insensitive (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: regex vs includes

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

regex

includes

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `regex vs includes`