Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Underscore equal vs Lodash equal vs === (version: 1)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Underscore equal(1.13.6) vs Lodash equal vs ===
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script> <script type="text/javascript"> window.lodash = _; _ = null; </script> <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.13.6/underscore-min.js'></script> <script type="text/javascript"> window.underscore = _; _ = null; </script>
Script Preparation code:
var str1 = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" var str1copy = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
Tests:
Underscore equal(1.13.6)
underscore.isEqual(str1, str1copy);
Lodash equal
lodash.isEqual(str1, str1copy);
===
str1 === str1copy
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Underscore equal(1.13.6)
Lodash equal
===
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark compares the performance of three equality checks: `===` (using strict equality), Lodash's `isEqual`, and Underscore's `isEqual`. We will analyze the options being compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Comparison Options** The benchmark tests three options: 1. **Strict Equality (`===`)**: This method checks if two values have the same value and data type. 2. **Lodash's `isEqual`**: Lodash is a utility library that provides a variety of functions for common tasks, including equality checking. `isEqual` takes two arguments: the first value to compare, and the second value to compare with. It returns a boolean indicating whether the values are equal. 3. **Underscore's `isEqual`**: Underscore is another utility library that provides similar functionality to Lodash. `isEqual` works similarly to Lodash's `isEqual`, but with some differences in behavior. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each option: * **Strict Equality (`===`)**: + Pros: Simple, fast, and widely supported. + Cons: Can be slow for large objects or complex data types, as it performs a deep equality check. * **Lodash's `isEqual`**: + Pros: Provides more features than strict equality, such as ignoring null and undefined values. + Cons: Slower than strict equality due to its additional checks, and requires the Lodash library to be loaded. * **Underscore's `isEqual`**: + Pros: Similar to Lodash's `isEqual`, with some differences in behavior. Faster than Lodash's `isEqual`. + Cons: Smaller performance advantage over strict equality compared to Lodash. **Library and Syntax Considerations** The benchmark uses two libraries: * **Lodash**: A utility library that provides a wide range of functions for common tasks, including equality checking. * **Underscore**: Another utility library with similar functionality to Lodash. The difference lies in its behavior, especially when dealing with null or undefined values. Both libraries require additional code to be loaded and initialized before use. **Other Alternatives** If you want to compare the performance of other equality checks, such as: * **Weak Equality (`==`)**: This method checks if two values have the same value, but may not consider data types. * **JSON-Based Equality**: This method uses JSON serialization to compare two objects.
Related benchmarks:
Equals vs underscore vs lodash
Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2
Underscore find vs Lodash find1
Underscore equal vs Lodash equal vs ===
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?