Benchmark: dsbfbjdsv fvbsdjfvsd sdjfvbsdfvs fsdfm wff

Tests:

obj
let obj={} for(let i=0;i<4;i++){ obj[i]=i }
map
let map=new Map(); for(let i=0;i<4;i++){ map.set(i,i) }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
obj
map

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmarking process involves testing the performance of specific code snippets, typically written in a minimalistic way, to measure their execution speed.

**What's being tested?**

The provided JSON represents two individual test cases:

1. **Object literal creation**: The script `for(let i=0;i<4;i++){\r\nobj[i]=i\r\n}` creates an object with properties from 0 to 3.
2. **Map creation**: The script `let map=new Map();\r\nfor(let i=0;i<4;i++){\r\nmap.set(i,i)\r\n}` creates a new Map instance and sets its elements.

**Comparison of options**

The benchmark compares the execution speed of these two approaches:

*   Object literal creation (using `{}`)
*   Map creation (using `Map()`)

The pros and cons of each approach are as follows:

*   **Object literal creation**: Pros:
    *   More concise syntax.
    *   Can be more memory-efficient for large objects.
*   Cons:
    *   May lead to slower performance due to the need to parse and execute the object initializer.
*   **Map creation**: Pros:
    *   Provides a specific data structure (a Map) that can be useful in certain scenarios.
*   Cons:
    *   Requires more syntax and may lead to higher overhead due to the creation of an instance.

**Library: none**

There are no external libraries used in these benchmark test cases. The code is self-contained, focusing solely on testing the execution speed of object literal creation versus Map creation.

**Special JS feature: none**

No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these benchmark test cases.

**Other alternatives**

Some alternative approaches to creating objects and Maps include:

*   Using constructors (`new Object()` or `new Map()`)
*   Using ES6 classes
*   Using libraries like Lodash or Ramda for object creation and manipulation

However, MeasureThat.net focuses on measuring the execution speed of basic object literal creation and Map instantiation.

**Benchmark preparation code**

The provided JSON does not contain any explicit script preparation code. It only includes a brief description of the test cases and their corresponding benchmark definitions.

**Individual test case explanation**

Each individual test case consists of:

1.  **Benchmark Definition**: A short JavaScript snippet that creates an object or Map instance.
2.  **Test Name**: A descriptive name for the test case (e.g., "obj" or "map").

These snippets are executed in a controlled environment to measure their execution speed.

**Latest benchmark result**

The provided JSON includes two test cases with their corresponding results:

1.  **Raw UAString**: The User Agent string of the testing device.
2.  **Browser**: The browser type and version used for testing.
3.  **DevicePlatform**: The platform type (Desktop or not).
4.  **OperatingSystem**: The operating system type.
5.  **ExecutionsPerSecond**: The measured execution speed in executions per second.

These results provide insight into the performance characteristics of object literal creation versus Map creation.

Related benchmarks:

dsbfbjdsv fvbsdjfvsd sdjfvbsdfvs fsdfm wff (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: obj vs map

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

obj

map

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):