Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
fgfdgfdfdg gfdg
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
obj vs map
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
obj
let obj={} obj["aa"]=34;
map
let map=new Map() map.set("aa",34)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
obj
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark information and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The `Name`, `Description`, `Script Preparation Code`, and `Html Preparation Code` fields are empty, which means no specific script or HTML is defined for this benchmark. This suggests that the benchmark focuses on the JavaScript engine's behavior without considering external factors like page rendering, network interactions, or UI-related events. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases: 1. `obj`: A simple variable assignment using a literal object: `let obj={}\r\n\r\nobj[\"aa\"]=34;\r\n`. * This test case measures the JavaScript engine's performance for creating and assigning a property to an object. 2. `map`: Another test case involving a Map data structure: `let map=new Map()\r\nmap.set(\"aa\",34)`. * Similar to the previous test case, this measures the engine's performance for creating a new Map instance and setting a key-value pair. **Comparison** The two test cases compare the performance of creating and assigning properties to an object (using an existing object literal) versus creating a new Map instance and setting a value. This comparison can help identify differences in JavaScript engine behavior, such as: * Cache effects: Are there any cache-related optimizations when using an existing object literal compared to creating a new Map instance? * Object creation overhead: Does the engine incur more overhead when creating a new Map instance versus using an existing object literal? **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using existing object literals (`obj`)**: * Pros: + Reduced overhead due to reusing an existing object + Potential cache effects, as the engine might be able to reuse or optimize the existing object's properties * Cons: + May not accurately represent real-world scenarios where objects are created from scratch 2. **Creating a new Map instance (`map`)**: * Pros: + More representative of real-world scenarios where maps are created from scratch * Cons: + Higher overhead due to creating a new map instance **Library and Syntax Considerations** In the provided benchmark, no specific libraries or special JavaScript features are used. However, if the benchmark were to include these factors, it would be essential to consider: * Library overhead: Would using a library like Lodash (which provides an `assign` function) impact performance compared to using plain object literals? * Special syntax and features: + Are there any specific syntax or feature-related optimizations that would affect performance? **Alternatives** If the benchmark were to be expanded, alternative approaches could include: 1. Using a more complex object literal with multiple property assignments. 2. Incorporating asynchronous or event-driven code to simulate real-world scenarios. 3. Using different data structures like arrays, sets, or collections. 4. Considering older JavaScript engines (e.g., ECMAScript 5) for additional comparisons. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches would require adjustments to the benchmark definition and test cases to ensure accurate results. In summary, this benchmark provides a straightforward comparison between creating an object literal and setting properties versus creating a new Map instance and setting a value. While it lacks specific library or syntax considerations, it can still offer valuable insights into the JavaScript engine's performance optimizations and behavior.
Related benchmarks:
Compute factorial of a number in JavaScript
ruse compiler factorial 002
ruse compiler factorial 003
ruse compiler factorial 004
Quick Sin Cos vs Math Sin Cos vs Fastest
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?