Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ruse compiler factorial 004
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
v0 vs v1 use strict vs v1 vs tailcall vs vanilla vs iterative
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
NNN = 100 function v0 () { function voidf(k) { return k(undefined); }; function pk(x, y) { console.log("pk", x, y); return voidf; } function trampoline(thunk) { // console.log('trampoline start', thunk) while (thunk && typeof thunk === "function") { // console.log('boing'); thunk = thunk(); } return thunk } function add(a, b) { return a + b; } function times(a, b) { return a * b; } let program = (function( kxx ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( (function( kk, factorial_0 ) { return (function( ) { return (function( kxx ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( (function( kk, t_3 ) { return (function( ) { return (function( kxx ) { return (function( ) { return factorial_0 ( (function( v ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( NNN ) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( 1 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( kxx, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}), (function( kv ) { return kv ( v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ( kk ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( ) { factorial_0 = (function( k ) { return k ( (function( kk, n_1, total_2 ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( kpr ) { return (function( ) { return n_1 ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( 0 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return kpr ( v0 === v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ( (function( kif ) { return /* if */ kif ? (function( ) { return total_2 ( k ) ;}) : (function( ) { return (function( kxx ) { return (function( ) { return factorial_0 ( (function( v ) { return (function( ) { return (function( kpr ) { return (function( ) { return n_1 ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( -1 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return kpr ( add ( v0, v1 ) ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return (function( kpr ) { return (function( ) { return n_1 ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return total_2 ( (function( v1 ) { return kpr ( times ( v0, v1 ) ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( kxx, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}), (function( kv ) { return kv ( v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ( kk ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}); return k ( voidf ) ;}) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( kxx, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ( kk ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v ) { return (function( ) { return voidf ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( kxx, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ; function output(x) { pk('output', x); return function() {}; } trampoline(function() {return program (output);}); } function v1strict() { "use strict"; function voidf(k) { return k(undefined); }; function pk() { console.log.apply(console, arguments); } function trampoline(thunk) { // console.log('trampoline start', thunk) while (thunk && typeof thunk === "function") { // console.log('boing'); thunk = thunk(); } return thunk } function prepend(v, a) { // a.slice().unshift(0); // avoid mutation with copy a.unshift(v); return a; } function apply(func, args) { return func.apply(this, args); } function add(a, b) { return a + b; } function times(a, b) { return a * b; } let program = (function( k ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( (function( k, fact_0 ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( (function( k, t_3 ) { return (function( k ) { return fact_0 ( (function( v ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( NNN ) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( 1 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}), (function( kv ) { return kv ( v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( ) { fact_0 = (function( k ) { return k ( (function( k, n_1, total_2 ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( k ) { return n_1 ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( 0 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return k ( v0 === v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( kif ) { return /* if */ kif ? (function( ) { return total_2 ( k ) ;}) : (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return fact_0 ( (function( v ) { return (function( k ) { return n_1 ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( -1 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return k ( add ( v0, v1 ) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return total_2 ( (function( v0 ) { return n_1 ( (function( v1 ) { return k ( times ( v0, v1 ) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}), (function( kv ) { return kv ( v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ) ;}); return k ( voidf ) ;}) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v ) { return voidf ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ; function output(x) { pk('output', x); return function() {}; } trampoline(function() {return program (output);}); } function v1() { function voidf(k) { return k(undefined); }; function pk() { console.log.apply(console, arguments); } function trampoline(thunk) { // console.log('trampoline start', thunk) while (thunk && typeof thunk === "function") { // console.log('boing'); thunk = thunk(); } return thunk } function prepend(v, a) { // a.slice().unshift(0); // avoid mutation with copy a.unshift(v); return a; } function apply(func, args) { return func.apply(this, args); } function add(a, b) { return a + b; } function times(a, b) { return a * b; } let program = (function( k ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( (function( k, fact_0 ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( (function( k, t_3 ) { return (function( k ) { return fact_0 ( (function( v ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( NNN ) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( 1 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}), (function( kv ) { return kv ( v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( ) { fact_0 = (function( k ) { return k ( (function( k, n_1, total_2 ) { return (function( k ) { return (function( k ) { return n_1 ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( 0 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return k ( v0 === v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( kif ) { return /* if */ kif ? (function( ) { return total_2 ( k ) ;}) : (function( ) { return (function( k ) { return fact_0 ( (function( v ) { return (function( k ) { return n_1 ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return k ( -1 ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return k ( add ( v0, v1 ) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( k ) { return total_2 ( (function( v0 ) { return n_1 ( (function( v1 ) { return k ( times ( v0, v1 ) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v1 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}), (function( kv ) { return kv ( v1 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ) ;}); return k ( voidf ) ;}) ;}) ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ( k ) ;}) ) ;}) ( (function( v ) { return voidf ( (function( v0 ) { return (function( ) { return v ( k, (function( kv ) { return kv ( v0 ) ;}) ) ;}) ;}) ) ;}) ) ;}) ; function output(x) { pk('output', x); return function() {}; } trampoline(function() {return program (output);}); } function vanilla() { function factorial (n) { return n === 0 ? 1 : n * factorial(n -1); } console.log(factorial(NNN)); } function tailcall() { function factorial (n, total) { return n === 0 ? total : factorial(n - 1, total * n); } console.log(factorial(NNN, 1)) } function iterative() { function sFact(num) { var rval=1; for (var i = 2; i <= num; i++) rval = rval * i; return rval; } console.log(sFact(NNN)); }
Tests:
v0
v0()
v1 use strict
v1strict()
v1
v1()
tailcall
tailcall()
vanilla
vanilla()
iterative
iterative()
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
v0
v1 use strict
v1
tailcall
vanilla
iterative
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Based on the provided benchmark results, I will analyze the performance of each test case and provide a general comparison. **Benchmark Results Analysis** Here are the results grouped by Test Name: * **v0**: 8710.904296875 ExecutionsPerSecond * **vanilla**: 11377.673828125 ExecutionsPerSecond * **v1 use strict**: 11384.3095703125 ExecutionsPerSecond * **v1**: 50900.0859375 ExecutionsPerSecond ( note: this result seems unusually high, but it's possible due to other factors) * **tailcall**: 56608.23828125 ExecutionsPerSecond **Comparison and Insights** Based on the results: * The `vanilla` test has a relatively high execution rate of 11377.673828125 seconds per second. * The `v0` test has a lower execution rate compared to the recursive `factorial` function. * The `tailcall` test outperforms all other tests, likely due to its optimized implementation. * The `v1 use strict` and `v1` tests have close execution rates, with the latter being slightly faster. **Conclusion** The results suggest that: 1. Tail call optimization significantly improves performance for this specific benchmark. 2. Vanilla JavaScript implementations can be competitive in terms of execution rate. 3. Test 0 ( `v0`) has a relatively low execution rate compared to other tests. Please note that these conclusions are based on the provided benchmark results and may not reflect the full picture of each test's performance characteristics or other factors affecting execution rates.
Related benchmarks:
ruse compiler factorial 001
ruse compiler factorial 002
ruse compiler factorial 003
ruse compiler factorial 010
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?