Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
bench simple split vs replace regex
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
simple split vs replace regex
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var authorization = 'bearer 1234567890'
Tests:
simple split
const token = authorization?.split(' ')[1] ?? '';
replace regex
const token = authorization.replace(/^bearer\s+/i, '');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
simple split
replace regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark, specifically designed to compare two approaches for extracting the token from an authorization string: simple split and regular expression replacement. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Simple Split**: This approach uses the `split()` method to divide the authorization string into parts separated by spaces. The token is then extracted as the second part (`authorization?.split(' ')[1] ?? '';`). 2. **Regular Expression Replacement**: This approach uses a regular expression to replace the prefix "bearer " with an empty string, effectively removing it from the authorization string. The resulting string contains only the token. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: * **Simple Split**: + Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and widely supported by most JavaScript engines. + Cons: May not work correctly with non-space separated tokens or edge cases like multiple spaces between the prefix and the token. * **Regular Expression Replacement**: + Pros: More robust and flexible, as it can handle different prefix formats and edge cases. However, regular expression engines might be slower than simple string manipulation. + Cons: May be less intuitive for some developers, and its performance might vary depending on the specific regex implementation. **Library Usage** None of the test code explicitly uses a JavaScript library, but the `authorization` variable is assigned a value using string interpolation (`"var authorization = 'bearer 1234567890'";`). This syntax is supported by most modern JavaScript engines without any external libraries. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. The code relies on standard JavaScript language features, such as string manipulation and regular expressions. **Other Alternatives** If you need to compare other approaches for extracting tokens from authorization strings, consider these alternatives: * Using a dedicated library like `axios` or `fetch`, which provide built-in support for token extraction. * Employing alternative parsing techniques, such as using `String.prototype.replace()` with multiple replace operations or leveraging a dedicated library like `parse-authorization`. * Investigating more advanced approaches, like machine learning-based token recognition or using WebAssembly-based libraries for optimized performance. These alternatives might be necessary depending on the specific requirements of your project or the complexity of the tokens to be extracted.
Related benchmarks:
str split vs regex replace
Regex vs split for Authorization Headers
test split vs match regex
Regex vs Split for base64 string
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?