Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for in Object.keys vs foreach Object.keys
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
for in Object.keys vs foreach Object.keys
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = new Object() var keys = (new Array(10000)).fill(0).map((x, i) => { return i + 1 }) keys.forEach((x) => { obj['prop' + x] = x })
Tests:
for in Object.keys
const keys = Object.keys(obj); for (let i = 0; i < keys.length; i += 1){ console.log(keys[i]); }
foreach Object.keys
Object.keys(obj).forEach(function(key) { console.log(key); });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for in Object.keys
foreach Object.keys
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for iterating over object keys in JavaScript: `for` loop with `Object.keys()` and `forEach()` method. The test aims to determine which approach is faster and more efficient. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code creates an object `obj` with 10,000 properties, where each property is assigned a value from 1 to 10,000 using the `fill()`, `map()`, and `forEach()` methods. The resulting object has keys ranging from 1 to 10,000. **Html Preparation Code** There is no HTML preparation code provided for this benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition consists of two test cases: 1. **"for in Object.keys"`**: This test case uses a traditional `for` loop with the `Object.keys()` method to iterate over the object's keys. 2. **"foreach Object.keys"`**: This test case uses the `forEach()` method with `Object.keys()` to iterate over the object's keys. **Comparing Options** The two approaches differ in how they access and manipulate the object's keys: * **`for in Object.keys()`**: This approach iterates over the keys using an indexed loop, where each iteration returns a key-value pair. * **"foreach Object.keys"`**: This approach uses `forEach()` to iterate over the keys without indexing. Instead, it receives a callback function that takes only one argument, the key value. **Pros and Cons** Here's a summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **`for in Object.keys()`**: + Pros: Can access object properties by index (e.g., `obj['prop1']`) and is more familiar to many developers. + Cons: May be slower due to indexing, as it needs to look up each property individually. * **"foreach Object.keys"`**: + Pros: More concise and expressive code, as it avoids explicit looping and indexing. + Cons: May not be as readable for some developers, especially those without experience with `forEach()`. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark beyond the standard `Object.keys()`, `for` loops, and `forEach()` method. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in alternative approaches, consider: 1. Using a library like Lodash's `mapKeys()` function to iterate over object keys without indexing. 2. Employing a loop that uses bitwise operations to access properties directly (e.g., `obj[0x01]`). 3. Utilizing the `Array.prototype.keys()` method (introduced in ECMAScript 2019) to access object keys. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs depending on your specific use case. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show that both approaches perform similarly, with Firefox 113 executing around 13-14 times per second. However, the actual performance difference might be negligible for most use cases, as the test object's size is relatively small (10,000 properties).
Related benchmarks:
For in vs Object.keys.forEach vs. Object.keys+for
Some benchmark
For in vs Object.keys.forEach vs For of Object.keys
For in vs Object.keys for loop vs Object.keys.forEach
For in vs Object.*.forEach vs Object.values vs _.forEach(_.values v3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?