Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
For in vs Object.keys.forEach vs. Object.keys+for
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
For In vs Object keys forEach vs For(;;) over Object.keys using keys.length
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = new Object() var keys = (new Array(100)).fill(0).map((x, i) => { return i + 1 }) keys.forEach((x) => { obj['prop' + x] = x })
Tests:
For In
for (var key in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) console.log(obj[key]) }
Object keys forEach
Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => console.log(obj[key]))
For(;;) over Object.keys using keys.length
for (let i = 0, keys = Object.keys(obj); i < keys.length; i++) { console.log(obj[keys[i]]); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
For In
Object keys forEach
For(;;) over Object.keys using keys.length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark tests three different approaches to iterate over an object's properties: `for` loop, `Object.keys()` with `forEach()`, and using `Object.keys()` and indexing into the array directly. **Approach 1: For In Loop** This approach uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate over the object's properties. The loop iterates over each property in the object using `var key in obj`, and checks if the property is owned by the object using `if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key))`. This approach is simple and straightforward. Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * Works well for most use cases Cons: * Can be slower than other approaches, especially for large objects * May not work correctly in some browsers or environments that don't support the `hasOwnProperty()` method **Approach 2: Object.keys() with forEach()** This approach uses the `Object.keys()` method to get an array of the object's properties, and then passes a callback function using `forEach()` to iterate over the properties. The callback function logs each property value to the console. Pros: * Fast and efficient * Works well for most use cases Cons: * Requires a modern JavaScript environment that supports `Object.keys()` * May not work correctly in older browsers or environments **Approach 3: For(;;) over Object.keys using keys.length** This approach uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate over the array of properties returned by `Object.keys()` directly. The loop iterates from 0 to the length of the array, and logs each property value to the console. Pros: * Fast and efficient * Works well for most use cases Cons: * Requires a modern JavaScript environment that supports array indexing * May not work correctly in older browsers or environments Other alternatives to these approaches include using `for...of` loops, which are more modern and concise. However, they may not be supported by older browsers or environments. **Library and Special JS Features** None of the benchmark test cases rely on any external libraries or special JavaScript features beyond those mentioned above. The `Object.keys()` method is a built-in part of the JavaScript standard library. **Other Considerations** When choosing an approach, consider the following factors: * Performance: If speed is critical, Approach 2 (`Object.keys() with forEach()`) may be the fastest. * Browser support: If you need to run this code in older browsers or environments, you may need to use a fallback approach (e.g., Approach 1 `For In Loop`). * Readability and maintainability: Approach 3 (`For(;;) over Object.keys using keys.length`) is often considered more readable than the other approaches. Ultimately, the choice of approach depends on your specific requirements and constraints.
Related benchmarks:
For in vs Object.keys.forEach
For in vs Object.keys.forEach FixedForYaRetard
For in vs For vs Object.keys.forEach
Some benchmark
For in vs Object.keys.forEach vs For of Object.keys
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?