Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
includes vs has test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
includes test vs has test
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a = [ "account-entity-icon-import", "account-settings", "activity-goal", "add-users", "advanced_customer_satisfaction", "all-apps", "api", "apple-chat", "assignment-rules", "audit-log", "auto-resolve", "automate-workflows", "block-ip", "business-hours-lg", "business-hours", "byot", "call-flow", "canned-response-lg", "canned-response", "chat-groups-lg", "chat-groups", "chat-languages", "chat-widget", "cm-survey", "contact-entity-icon-import", "conversation-properties", "crm-code-library", "crm-settings", "cross-domain", "currency", "custom-attribute", "custom-modules-import", "custom-modules", "deal-entity-icon-import", "deal-insights", "deal-pipeline", "domain-verification", "email_footer", "email_template", "eu-datacentre", "facebook", "faq-lg", "faq", "field-dependencies", "groups", "icon-advanced-automation", "icon-announcement", "icon-auto-assignment-rules", "icon-calendar-event-suggestions", "icon-chat-webhooks", "icon-cm-assistant", "icon-cm-labels", "icon-contacts-sync", "icon-conversation-sla", "icon-cpq-settings", "icon-create-tasks-and-tickets", "icon-crm-fields", "icon-custom-module", "icon-document-templates", "icon-forecasting-32px", "icon-incoming-emails", "icon-live-translate", "icon-mobile-chat-sdk", "icon-notify-me-form", "icon-sandbox", "icon-shopify-settings", "icon-sms", "icon-social-gbm", "icon-social-instagram", "icon-social-line", "icon-team-inbox", "icon-territories", "icon-transactional-emails", "icon-woocommerce-settings", "intelliassign", "ip-whitelisting", "ip", "js", "lead-entity-icon-import", "marketplace-apps", "marketplace-for-caller", "messages", "migration", "offline-exp", "outgoing-emails", "phone-groups", "phone-metrics", "pipelines", "plans-billing", "play-circle", "predictive-scoring", "product-entity-icon-import", "purchase-number", "quick-access", "sales-groups", "satisfaction", "score-customization", "sdk-chat", "setting-facebook", "settings-account", "sip-phones", "status", "sto", "subscription_types", "support_email_configuration", "threads", "topics-lg", "topics", "user-entity-icon-import", "users-lg", "voicemail-drops", "web-js", "webforms", "whatsapp", "workflows" ]; var b = new Set(a)
Tests:
includes test
return a.includes('whatsapp')
has test
return b.has('whatsapp')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
includes test
has test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks can be a complex task, as it involves understanding the nuances of how different approaches impact execution speed. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark tests two different approaches for checking if a string contains a specific substring: `includes` and `has`. The input arrays `a` and `b` contain over 100 strings, which are then used to create sets using `Set()` constructor. These sets are compared with the presence of the string 'whatsapp' using both `includes` and `has` methods. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **`includes` method**: The `includes` method is a built-in JavaScript method that checks if a string contains a specific substring. 2. **`has` method**: The `has` method is not a standard JavaScript method, but it's a custom implementation of the `includes` method for sets. **Pros and Cons** 1. **`includes` method**: * Pros: Fast and widely supported across browsers and versions. * Cons: Can be slow for large strings or arrays due to the need to iterate over each character. 2. **`has` method (custom implementation)**: * Pros: Optimized for set operations, potentially faster than `includes` for large sets or arrays. * Cons: Not a standard JavaScript method, which may lead to compatibility issues across browsers and versions. **Other Considerations** When dealing with large datasets, other factors can impact performance: 1. **Cache efficiency**: The way data is cached in memory can significantly affect performance. In this case, the use of `Set()` creates an optimized cache. 2. **JavaScript engine optimizations**: Different JavaScript engines (e.g., V8 in Chrome) may optimize certain methods or operations differently. **Library Usage** In this benchmark, no external libraries are used besides the built-in `Set()` constructor and string manipulation functions like `includes` and `has`.
Related benchmarks:
includes vs or
includes or some
Compare Or vs Includes
String: Includes vs equality check
equals-vs-includes
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?