Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
includes vs or
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
includes vs or
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
variavel = 6
Tests:
includes
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6].includes(variavel)
or
variavel === 1 || variavel === 2 || variavel === 3 || variavel === 4 || variavel === 5 || variavel === 6
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
includes
or
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **What is being tested?** The provided benchmark tests two different approaches to check if a variable `variavel` is within a specific range: using the `includes()` method and using an explicit OR (`||`) chain. **Options being compared:** 1. **Includes()**: This method checks if the element (in this case, `variabel`) exists in the array `[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]`. 2. **OR (`||`) chain**: This approach uses a series of OR conditions to check if `variavel` is equal to any of the values in the array `[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]`. **Pros and Cons:** **Includes():** * Pros: + More concise and readable + Faster execution (because it's a built-in method) * Cons: + May be slower for large arrays due to the overhead of searching + Can be slower than an explicit OR chain if the search is not exact **OR (`||`) chain:** * Pros: + Can be faster for large arrays because it only checks equality with each value once + More control over the comparison logic (e.g., using `===` instead of `==`) * Cons: + Less concise and more verbose + May have performance overhead due to the number of checks **Library:** There is no external library being used in this benchmark. The `includes()` method is a built-in JavaScript method, and the OR chain is a standard syntax for conditional logic. **Special JS features or syntax:** None mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some older browsers might not support the `includes()` method or have different implementation details. **Benchmark preparation code:** The script preparation code sets a variable `variavel` to the value 6. **Other alternatives:** If you need to check if an element exists in an array, you could also use other approaches: * Using `indexOf()`: `array.indexOf(element)` returns the index of the first occurrence of the element, or -1 if not found. * Using a for loop: iterating over the array and checking each element individually. * Using a more modern approach with ES6+ features, such as `findIndex()`. In general, using the `includes()` method is often the most concise and efficient way to check if an element exists in an array. However, the choice of approach depends on the specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
set.has vs. array.includes
not includes vs. not equal to
two condition if vs includes compare
includes vs or (first result)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?