Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
js array functions comparison
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
1 vs 2
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
1
const a = 'randomText'; if (a !== 'text' && a !== 'tex2' && a !== 'text3' && a !== 'text4' && a !== 'text6'){}
2
const a = 'randomText'; const arr = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g']; if (!arr.includes(a)){}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1
2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two different approaches for checking if a value exists in an array. The test cases are: 1. `const a = 'randomText';\r\n\r\nif (a !== 'text' && a !== 'tex2' && a !== 'text3' && a !== 'text4' && a !== 'text6'){}` - This test case checks if the string `a` is not equal to any of the given values. It's essentially testing the performance of an array search operation using multiple conditions. 2. `const a = 'randomText';\r\nconst arr = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g'];\r\nif (!arr.includes(a)){}` - This test case checks if the string `a` is not included in the array `arr`. It's testing the performance of using the `includes()` method. **Options Compared** The two main options being compared are: - **Multiple Conditionals (Ternary Operator Approach)**: This approach uses multiple conditions to check if a value exists in an array. The test case 1 uses this approach. - **Array Inclusion Method**: This approach uses the `includes()` method or similar methods provided by modern JavaScript engines to check if a value exists in an array. The test case 2 uses this approach. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief overview of each approach: ### Multiple Conditionals (Ternary Operator Approach) - **Pros**: + Often faster for small arrays because the engine can stop evaluating as soon as it finds a match. + Simple to implement in certain cases. - **Cons**: - Can be slower when searching over large arrays because the engine has to evaluate every condition, even if some conditions are false. - More complex and harder to read for larger search ranges. ### Array Inclusion Method - **Pros**: - Often faster than multiple conditional approaches, especially for larger arrays because the `includes()` method can take advantage of more advanced algorithmic optimizations. - More readable and maintainable when dealing with larger array searches. - **Cons**: - May have slightly lower performance on very small arrays due to overhead from the method call. **Considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the size of your array, how often you're searching for a value in that array, and readability concerns. In general, modern JavaScript engines are optimized to be efficient with array searches, so unless specific performance characteristics are critical, readability should take precedence. ### Library Usage Neither test case directly uses any libraries beyond standard JavaScript functionality (like `includes()`). **Special JS Features or Syntax** - Neither of the provided benchmark cases utilizes any special features like async functions, Promises, or ES6+ features. However, using some library that implements these features would introduce different testing considerations. **Alternatives** Other approaches to array search could include: 1. **Linear Search**: Iterate through each element in an array until a match is found. 2. **Binary Search**: Similar to linear search but uses the middle of the range for comparisons to reduce the number of iterations. 3. **Set Data Structures**: Convert the data type being searched into a set (a collection of unique elements). Searching for values in sets generally has faster lookup times than arrays due to optimized algorithmic complexity. Choosing an array search method or implementation heavily depends on the specific requirements of your project, including performance needs and ease of maintenance.
Related benchmarks:
for loop vs Array.some
Lodash difference vs JS filter and includes
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of
Correct for loop vs Array.some
compare arrays without order
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?