Benchmark: for vs foreach vs some vs for..of

Script Preparation code:

var array = new Array(100);

Tests:

for
let arrLen = array.length for (var i = 0; i < arrLen; i++) { array[i]; }
foreach
array.forEach(function(i) { array[i]; });
some
array.some(function(i) { array[i]; });
for..of
for (var i of array) { array[i]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for
foreach
some
for..of

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.

**Script Preparation Code**
The script preparation code is `var array = new Array(100);`, which creates an array of 100 elements. This will be the input for our loop benchmarks.

**Html Preparation Code**
There is no HTML preparation code provided, so we can assume that this benchmark is running in a JavaScript-only environment.

**Benchmark Definition**
The benchmark definition compares the performance of four different loops:

1. `for` loop: `let arrLen = array.length; for (var i = 0; i < arrLen; i++) { array[i]; }`
2. `forEach` loop: `array.forEach(function(i) { array[i]; });`
3. `some` loop: `array.some(function(i) { array[i]; });`
4. `for..of` loop: `for (var i of array) { array[i]; }`

**Options Compared**
The benchmark is comparing the performance of each loop in terms of the number of executions per second.

**Pros and Cons**

* **For Loop**: The most traditional and widely used loop type. It has a simple syntax but can be slower due to the need to manually increment the index variable.
* **ForEach Loop**: A more modern and concise way of looping over arrays. It's faster than the traditional `for` loop because it eliminates the need for manual indexing.
* **Some Loop**: A specialized loop that returns true as soon as a condition is met, making it useful for early exit scenarios. However, it can be slower due to the overhead of checking the condition on every iteration.
* **For..Of Loop**: A modern and concise way of looping over arrays using the `for...of` syntax. It's faster than traditional loops because it eliminates the need for manual indexing.

**Library Used**
The benchmark is not using any external libraries, but it does use built-in JavaScript features like `forEach`, `some`, and `for...of`.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**
The benchmark uses some specialized JavaScript features, including:

* `let` declarations (introduced in ECMAScript 2015)
* The `var` keyword with a non-strict mode (`var i = 0;`)
* The `for...of` loop syntax (introduced in ECMAScript 2015)

**Other Alternatives**
If you're interested in exploring other alternatives, here are a few options:

* **While Loop**: Another traditional loop type that uses a conditional statement to control the iteration.
* **Array.prototype.reduce()**: A method that can be used to iterate over an array and perform operations on each element. It's faster than traditional loops for certain use cases.

Keep in mind that the choice of loop type ultimately depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.

Related benchmarks:

for vs foreach vs some vs for..of (version: 0)

Compare loop performance v2

Comparing performance of: for vs foreach vs some vs for..of

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

for

foreach

some

for..of

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):