Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array joining comparadfsvf
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = new Array(1e5).fill({a:2,b:3,c:4}); var other = Array.concat(params,params,params);
spread operator
var params = new Array(1e5).fill({a:2,b:3,c:4}); var other = [...params,...params,...params];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark measures the performance difference between the traditional `concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`) for array joining operations. **Options Compared:** 1. **Traditional Concat() Method**: The traditional way of concatenating arrays using the `+` operator or the `concat()` method. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: A modern way of concatenating arrays introduced in ES6, which uses the spread operator to expand an array into individual elements. **Pros and Cons:** * **Traditional Concat() Method**: + Pros: - Wide support across older browsers (IE 8+) - Easy to read and understand for developers familiar with the method + Cons: - Generally slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of creating temporary arrays - May lead to memory leaks if not used carefully * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: - Faster execution compared to the traditional concat() method - More concise and expressive code, making it easier to read and maintain + Cons: - Limited support across older browsers (Chrome 64+, Firefox 57+, Edge 14+) - May not be immediately intuitive for developers without ES6 experience **Library/Function Used:** The benchmark uses the `Array.prototype.concat()` method, which is a standard JavaScript function for concatenating arrays. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** There are no specific JS features or syntax used in this benchmark that require additional explanation. The focus is solely on the performance comparison between two different array joining methods. **Other Alternatives:** * **Array.prototype.push()**: Another way to concatenate arrays by pushing elements onto an existing array, although less efficient than both `concat()` and spread operator. * **Array.from()**: A method for creating a new array from an iterable or an array-like object, which can be used for array joining but may have additional overhead. When writing benchmarks like this, it's essential to consider the trade-offs between performance, code readability, and compatibility across different browsers and versions. MeasureThat.net provides a valuable platform for comparing various JavaScript features and libraries, helping developers optimize their code for better performance and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operatordsvsdxvseafawfawfawf
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operatorf4trefsc
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?