Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operatorf4trefsc
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares two approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: 1. `Array.prototype.concat()` 2. The new ES6 spread operator (`...`) **Options Compared** The benchmark tests these two options against each other, allowing users to compare their performance. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: * Pros: Well-established, widely supported by browsers. * Cons: May have additional overhead due to the method call. 2. **ES6 Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: More concise, efficient, and modern. * Cons: Requires support for ES6 syntax in browsers. **Library/Functionality Used** The benchmark uses the `concat()` method on the global `Array` prototype, which is a built-in JavaScript function. The spread operator (`...`) is also a built-in JavaScript feature introduced in ES6. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark utilizes the new spread operator (`...`), which is a syntax introduced in ES6 (ECMAScript 2015). This feature allows for more concise array creation and manipulation. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark measures the performance of each approach, likely to help users determine which one is faster or more suitable for their specific use case. * By comparing two approaches, users can gain insight into the trade-offs between conciseness and performance in JavaScript development. **Alternatives** If you need alternatives to the spread operator or `concat()`, consider: 1. Using other array methods, such as `Array.prototype.push()` and `Array.prototype.splice()`. 2. Utilizing libraries or frameworks that provide optimized array manipulation functions. 3. Implementing your own custom array concatenation function. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have varying performance characteristics and may not be as concise or efficient as the spread operator or `concat()`.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?