Benchmark: empty an array in JavaScript - splice vs setting length. 444 333

Tests:

Set length to zero
var size = 1000; var arr2 = []; for (var i = 0; i < size; i++){ arr2.push(i); } arr2.length = 64;
Splice
var size = 1000; var arr3 = []; for (var i = 0; i < size; i++){ arr3.push(i); } arr3.splice(64);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Set length to zero
Splice

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Set length to zero

194K/s

Splice

162K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Set length to zero	193,719 Ops/sec
Splice	161,934 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for emptying an array in JavaScript: setting the length of the array to zero, and using the `splice()` method with a specific index. The test aims to determine which approach is faster.

**Test Case 1: Setting Length to Zero**

This test case creates an array of size 1000, populates it with integers from 0 to 999, and then sets the length of the array to 64.

```javascript
var size = 1000;
var arr2 = [];
for (var i = 0; i < size; i++) {
    arr2.push(i);
}
arr2.length = 64;
```

**Pros and Cons**

Setting the `length` property directly has the following advantages:

* It is a simple and straightforward way to reset an array.
* It avoids creating a new array or modifying existing elements.

However, it also has some potential drawbacks:

* If the array contains sparse properties (i.e., some indices are missing), setting the length may not work as expected.
* Some browsers may have issues with this approach.

On the other hand, using `splice()` has its own set of advantages and disadvantages:

* It is generally considered a more modern and safer way to remove elements from an array.
* It does not modify existing elements or create new arrays in memory.

However, it also has some potential drawbacks:

* It can be slower than setting the length property directly, especially for large arrays.
* It requires knowing the specific index at which to start removing elements.

**Test Case 2: Using Splice()**

This test case creates an array of size 1000, populates it with integers from 0 to 999, and then uses `splice()` to remove elements starting from index 64.

```javascript
var size = 1000;
var arr3 = [];
for (var i = 0; i < size; i++) {
    arr3.push(i);
}
arr3.splice(64);
```

**Library: None**

Neither of the test cases uses a specific JavaScript library. The only external dependency is the browser's implementation of the `length` property and the `splice()` method.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax: None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases.

**Benchmark Results**

The benchmark results show that setting the length to zero is faster than using `splice()`. The exact numbers vary depending on the browser and execution per second, but overall, setting the length is slightly faster.

**Alternatives**

Other approaches to emptying an array in JavaScript include:

* Using `forEach()` with a callback function that returns `undefined` or `null`
* Using `map()` with an empty callback function
* Using `filter()` with an empty callback function

These alternatives may have different performance characteristics and may be more suitable for specific use cases. However, they are not typically considered as fast as setting the length property directly or using `splice()`.

empty an array in JavaScript - splice vs setting length. 444 333 (version: 0)

Based on question on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1232040/how-do-i-empty-an-array-in-javascript

Comparing performance of: `Set length to zero vs Splice`

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Set length to zero

Splice

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

empty an array in JavaScript - splice vs setting length. 444 333 (version: 0)

Based on question on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1232040/how-do-i-empty-an-array-in-javascript

Comparing performance of: Set length to zero vs Splice

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Set length to zero

Splice

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Set length to zero vs Splice`