Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.splice(0, N) vs Array.length === N
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
`Array.slice(0, N)` vs `Array.length === N`
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr = Array.from(Array(100).keys());
Tests:
`Array.slice(0, N)`
arr.length = 20;
`Array.length === N`
arr.length === 100;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
`Array.slice(0, N)`
`Array.length === N`
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 142 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
`Array.slice(0, N)`
29867256.0 Ops/sec
`Array.length === N`
153646384.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is testing two approaches to measuring array length: 1. `Array.splice(0, N)`: This approach uses `splice()` method to remove the first `N` elements from an empty array, effectively setting its length to `N`. 2. `Array.length === N`: This approach checks if the length of the array is equal to `N` directly. **Options Compared** * `Array.splice(0, N)` vs `Array.length === N` * The first option uses a method call (`splice()`) to modify the array's length. * The second option uses a simple property access (`length`). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **`Array.splice(0, N)`** + Pros: - Works on all browsers, including older ones that may not support `Array.length === N`. - Can be used to remove elements from an array. + Cons: - Modifies the original array. - May have performance implications due to the method call and potential reallocation of memory. * **`Array.length === N`** + Pros: - Directly checks the length property, which is usually fast. - Does not modify the original array. + Cons: - Only works on modern browsers that support `Array.length === N`. - May require additional logic to handle edge cases or errors. **Library and Special JS Features** None of the benchmark uses any external libraries, and it does not test special JavaScript features like async/await, promises, or ES6 classes. The focus is solely on the basic length property comparison. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for measuring array length include: * Using `Array.from()` with an empty iterable to create a new array of a specific length. * Using `Object.create(null)` and then setting the `length` property directly on the object (although this method is not recommended due to potential security concerns). It's worth noting that in modern JavaScript, the `Array.length === N` approach is generally considered the most efficient and idiomatic way to check an array's length. However, older browsers may require the use of `Array.splice(0, N)` as a fallback.
Related benchmarks:
array.splice vs array.length
empty an array in JavaScript - splice vs setting length faster
Splice vs shift to remove at beginning of array (fixed from slice)
Splice vs Shift to remove from the beginning
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?