Benchmark: Performance Spread1

Script Preparation code:

var x = new Array(100);

for (var i = 0; i < x.length; i++) {
  x[i] = { item : (new Array(100)).fill(Math.floor(Math.random() * i)) };
}



window.top.tests = {aPush:[], aSpread:[]};
window.test = x;
window.cutoff = 5000;

Tests:

push
for (let element of window.test) window.top.tests.aPush.push(...element.item); if (window.top.tests.aPush.length > window.cutoff) { window.top.tests.aPush = []; console.log('reset control'); }
spread
for (let element of window.test) window.top.tests.aSpread = [...window.top.tests.aSpread,...element.item]; if (window.top.tests.aSpread.length > window.cutoff) { window.top.tests.aPush = []; console.log('reset control'); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
push
spread

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Fill array with random integers
Array.from vs Spread. But with one thousand sequential elements and with one thousand random elements from zero and one thousand.
array.from vs spread with set
.at vs [x]
Adding to an existing array from another (loop, for of, forEach, spread) [1]

Performance Spread1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: push vs spread

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

push

spread

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results