Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
.at vs [x]
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
x[0] vs x.at(0)
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var k = new Array(10000).fill(Math.random()*1000).map(e=>(Math.random()*1000));
Tests:
x[0]
return k[0];
x.at(0)
return k.at(0);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
x[0]
x.at(0)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to accessing an element at a specific index in an array: using square bracket notation (`x[0]`) versus the `at()` method (introduced in ECMAScript 2022). **Options Compared** There are two test cases: 1. `x[0]`: Uses traditional square bracket notation to access the first element of the array. 2. `x.at(0)`: Uses the `at()` method to access the first element of the array. **Pros and Cons** **`x[0]`** Pros: * Widely supported across older browsers and environments, where the `at()` method might not be available. * Simple and easy to implement. Cons: * May lead to slower performance due to the need for iterating over the array elements using bracket notation. **`x.at(0)`** Pros: * Offers better performance and efficiency compared to traditional bracket notation, especially in modern browsers that support the `at()` method. * More readable code, as it explicitly conveys the intent of accessing an element at a specific index. Cons: * Requires support for the `at()` method, which might not be available in older browsers or environments. * May require additional work to implement and ensure compatibility across different platforms. **Library: Array.prototype.at()** The `at()` method is a part of the ECMAScript standard (ES2022) that allows accessing elements at specific indices using a more readable syntax. The library uses this method to compare the performance difference between traditional bracket notation and the new `at()` method. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax: none mentioned** Since there's no mention of special JavaScript features or syntax in this benchmark, we can assume it focuses solely on the array access comparison. **Other Alternatives** If you want to test other aspects of array access, you could consider adding more test cases, such as: * Using `indexOf()` and then accessing the element at that index. * Comparing performance with different array sizes or data types (e.g., strings, objects). * Testing error handling scenarios, like trying to access an index out of bounds. By expanding on this benchmark, you can create a more comprehensive test suite for array access methods in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Fill array with random integers
at 500 vs [500]
.at vs [x] (with last)
array vs float64 for io and slice
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?