Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Math.min.apply vs spread operator
(version: 0)
Compare spread operator with passing arguments via apply
Comparing performance of:
Math.min.apply vs spread operator
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Math.min.apply
const params = [ 2, 4, 2, 1, 9, 4, 2, 4, 2, 1, 9, 4, 2, 4, 2, 1, 9, 4 ]; const min = Math.min.apply(null, params);
spread operator
const params = [ 2, 4, 2, 1, 9, 4, 2, 4, 2, 1, 9, 4, 2, 4, 2, 1, 9, 4 ]; const min = Math.min(...params);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Math.min.apply
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark, titled "Math.min.apply vs spread operator", aims to compare two approaches for finding the minimum value in an array: 1. Using the `apply` method with a null context (`Math.min.apply(null, params)`) 2. Using the spread operator (`...params`) to pass the array elements as separate arguments **Options Compared** The benchmark compares these two options, which differ in how they handle passing multiple array elements as arguments to the `Math.min` function. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Using `apply` method**: * Pros: + Explicitly passes all array elements as separate arguments. + Can be beneficial when working with legacy code or libraries that expect a specific argument list format. * Cons: + May have performance overhead due to the extra function call and context setup. + Can lead to confusing code if not used carefully, especially in complex scenarios. 2. **Using the spread operator (`...`)**: * Pros: + More concise and expressive than using `apply`. + Reduces the risk of typos or incorrect argument passing. * Cons: + May have a slight performance overhead due to the extra operation. **Library Used** None explicitly mentioned in this benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that both approaches rely on the built-in JavaScript functions `Math.min` and array spread (`...`) syntax. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The use of the spread operator (`...`) is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for more concise and expressive way of passing multiple values as arguments to a function. This feature is also widely supported across most modern browsers and Node.js environments. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few examples: * Using `Array.prototype.reduce()` method: `Math.min(...params)` is equivalent to `params.reduce(Math.min)`. * Using `Array.prototype.every()` method with a custom callback function: `Math.min.apply(null, params.every(Math.min))` (not recommended due to performance overhead). Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and may not be as concise or expressive as the original spread operator approach. I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark better!
Related benchmarks:
another test 2
Math.round vs Bitwise
toFixed vs Math.round vs |(bitwise or)
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() Equality Comparisons
ParseInt vs conditional ~~
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?