Benchmark: moment vs noop - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>

Tests:

with moment
for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { moment(); }
without moment
const noop = () => undefined; for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { noop(); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
with moment
without moment

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and individual test cases.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking framework. It defines two main components:

1. **Script Preparation Code**: This section is empty, which means no specific code needs to be executed before running the benchmarks.
2. **Html Preparation Code**: A script tag is included to load the Moment.js library (version 2.22.0) from a CDN.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark has two test cases:

1. **"with moment"**
	* Benchmark Definition: `for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { moment(); }`
	* This test case is designed to measure the performance of calling the Moment.js library.
2. **"without moment"**
	* Benchmark Definition: `const noop = () => undefined; for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { noop(); }`
	* This test case is designed to measure the performance of anoop function call, which is essentially doing nothing.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases compare the performance of calling the Moment.js library versus an empty function call (noop).

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

1. **Moment.js Call**
	* Pros:
		+ Measuring the actual performance impact of loading and executing the Moment.js library.
		+ Helps identify potential bottlenecks in the application's startup time.
	* Cons:
		+ May include unnecessary overhead due to the library's initialization and parsing processes.
2. **noop Function Call**
	* Pros:
		+ Eliminates any potential overhead from loading the Moment.js library.
		+ Focuses on measuring the pure performance of the function call itself.
	* Cons:
		+ May not accurately represent real-world scenarios, as it's an intentionally empty function call.

**Moment.js Library and its Purpose**

The Moment.js library is a popular JavaScript date and time manipulation library. Its primary purpose is to provide a convenient API for working with dates and times in a readable and easy-to-use manner. It also offers various features like formatting, parsing, and calculations.

In the context of this benchmark, using the Moment.js library serves as a baseline measurement, while the noop function call serves as a control group to isolate any additional overhead introduced by the library itself.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

None are explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that Moment.js has various formatting options and methods (e.g., `moment().format()`, `moment().diff()`), but none of these are used in the benchmark definitions.

**Other Alternatives:**

For JavaScript microbenchmarking, other popular alternatives include:

1. **Benchmark.js**: A lightweight, high-performance benchmarking framework for Node.js and browser environments.
2. **jsperf**: An older, now-maintained benchmarking framework specifically designed for browser environments.
3. **Google's Benchmark**: A widely used benchmarking library developed by Google, which offers a range of features for microbenchmarking JavaScript code.

These alternatives may offer different features, performance characteristics, or even entirely new approaches to microbenchmarking JavaScript code.

Related benchmarks:

moment vs noop (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: with moment vs without moment

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

with moment

without moment

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):