Benchmark: moment vs date - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.30.1/moment.min.js"></script>

Tests:

moment
moment().valueOf();
date
Number(new Date())

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
moment
date

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:125.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/125.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 125 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
moment	2226761.8 Ops/sec
date	7046907.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested:**
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark test case on MeasureThat.net, where two individual tests are compared:

1. `moment()`: This test measures the performance of the Moment.js library, which provides date and time manipulation functions.
2. `Number(new Date())`: This test measures the performance of native JavaScript's `Date` object.

**Options being compared:**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of using Moment.js (`moment()`) versus native JavaScript's built-in `Date` object (`Number(new Date())`). These are two different approaches to handling date and time calculations in JavaScript:

* **Moment.js**: A popular library for working with dates and times in JavaScript. It provides a wide range of methods for parsing, manipulating, and formatting dates.
* **Native JavaScript `Date` object**: The built-in `Date` object in JavaScript allows you to create and manipulate dates using various methods.

**Pros and Cons:**

**Moment.js (moment()):**

Pros:

* Easier to use and more intuitive than native `Date` object
* Provides a wide range of features for date and time manipulation, such as formatting, parsing, and calculation
* Can be useful when working with complex date calculations or data

Cons:

* Can add overhead due to the library's functionality and complexity
* May not be suitable for very simple date-related tasks

**Native JavaScript `Date` object (Number(new Date())):**

Pros:

* Lightweight and optimized for performance
* Fast and efficient for basic date-related operations
* Suitable for most use cases where only basic date calculations are needed

Cons:

* Can be more difficult to use and less intuitive than Moment.js
* Limited functionality compared to Moment.js, especially when it comes to formatting and parsing dates.

**Library considerations:**
The Moment.js library is used in the benchmark test case. Moment.js is a popular choice for working with dates and times in JavaScript due to its ease of use, flexibility, and wide range of features.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**
This benchmark does not involve any special JavaScript features or syntax that require explanation beyond the basics of date and time manipulation.

**Other alternatives:**
If you need a more lightweight solution for basic date-related operations, other alternatives to native JavaScript's `Date` object could include:

* The Date Fns library: A smaller, more focused library on date manipulation functions.
* Luxon: A modern JavaScript library for working with dates and times that is designed for performance and ease of use.

However, if you need a wide range of features and functionality for date and time calculations, Moment.js remains a popular and widely-used choice.

Related benchmarks:

moment vs date (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: moment vs date

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

moment

date

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):