Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
moment
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
with moment vs without moment
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>
Tests:
with moment
for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { moment(); }
without moment
for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { // nothing }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
with moment
without moment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is represented by the following JSON object: ```json { "Name": "moment ", "Description": null, "Script Preparation Code": null, "Html Preparation Code": "\r\n<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.22.0/moment.min.js'></script>" } ``` Here's what's being tested: * The `Name` field indicates that the benchmark is named "moment". * The `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code` fields are empty, indicating that no custom code needs to be prepared before running the benchmark. * The `Html Preparation Code` loads a specific version of the Moment.js library (`2.22.0`) from a CDN. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases: ```json [ { "Benchmark Definition": "for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {\r\n moment();\r\n}", "Test Name": "with moment" }, { "Benchmark Definition": "for (let i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {\r\n // nothing\r\n}", "Test Name": "without moment" } ] ``` Here's what's being compared: * The first test case (`with moment`) uses the Moment.js library in each iteration of the loop, which likely measures the performance impact of calling `moment()` repeatedly. * The second test case (`without moment`) does not use the Moment.js library at all, serving as a baseline for comparison. **Library: Moment.js** Moment.js is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. Its primary purpose is to provide a consistent and intuitive way of handling date-related tasks, such as parsing, formatting, and calculating time intervals. In this benchmark, the Moment.js library is being used to measure its performance when called repeatedly in a loop. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The code only uses standard JavaScript constructs, such as loops, conditional statements, and function calls. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in running similar benchmarks for other libraries or scenarios, here are some alternatives to consider: * For date-related tasks, you could use libraries like `date-fns` or `luxon`, which provide a more modern and concise API. * For testing the performance of JavaScript engines, you could create benchmarking tests using tools like `jsperf` (now deprecated) or `Benchmark.js`. * For measuring the performance impact of specific JavaScript features or syntaxes, you could use libraries like ` benchmarks-js` or ` benchmark-chrome`. Keep in mind that each alternative has its own strengths and weaknesses, and some may be better suited to your specific needs than others.
Related benchmarks:
moment vs datefns format f
Date vs moment 1238uu
date to iso comparaison with mutable moment
Compare moment vs native date format 2.0
date-fns vs moment
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?