Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
date to iso comparaison with mutable moment
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
moment/luxon vs moment/moment vs js-joda vs dayjs vs native
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/moment.js/2.24.0/moment.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.21.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@js-joda/core@1.12.0/dist/js-joda.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1.8.18/dayjs.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.__date__ = new Date(); window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';
Tests:
moment/luxon
var actual = luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2017-05-15").plus({days: 1}).toString(); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
moment/moment
var actual = moment("2017-05-15").add(1, 'd').toISOString(); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
js-joda
var actual = JSJoda.LocalDate.parse("2017-05-15").plusDays(1).format(JSJoda.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_LOCAL_DATE); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
dayjs
var actual = dayjs("2017-05-15").add(1, 'day').toISOString(); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
native
var date = new Date("2017-05-15"); var timestamp = date + 24*60*60*1000; var actual = new Date(timestamp); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
moment/luxon
moment/moment
js-joda
dayjs
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases for you. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of different libraries for converting a date string to an ISO format, with various options (e.g., adding days, minutes, or seconds) compared. The specific comparison is between `moment`, `luxon`, `js-joda`, `dayjs`, and native JavaScript implementations. **Options Compared** The test cases compare the following options: 1. Adding days: `luxon.DateTime.fromISO("2017-05-15").plus({days: 1}).toString()` 2. Adding days with another unit (minutes): `moment("2017-05-15").add(1, 'd').toISOString()` 3. Using a custom date format: `JSJoda.LocalDate.parse("2017-05-15").plusDays(1).format(JSJoda.DateTimeFormatter.ISO_LOCAL_DATE)` 4. Adding days with the `dayjs` library: `dayjs("2017-05-15").add(1, 'day').toISOString()` 5. Native JavaScript implementation (adding seconds): `var date = new Date("2017-05-15"); var timestamp = date + 24*60*60*1000; var actual = new Date(timestamp);` **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Luxon**: Luxon is a modern, efficient library with a simple API. Pros: fast, flexible, and easy to use. Cons: may not be as well-known as other libraries. 2. **Moment.js**: Moment.js is a popular, widely-used library with a comprehensive set of features. Pros: extensive documentation, large community support. Cons: older implementation, slower performance compared to Luxon. 3. **Js-joda**: Js-joda is a Java-based library adapted for JavaScript, offering similar functionality to Joda-Time. Pros: robust, feature-rich, and easy to use. Cons: may have additional dependencies, slower performance compared to native implementations. 4. **Day.js**: Day.js is a lightweight, fast library with a simple API. Pros: efficient, easy to use, and well-maintained. Cons: relatively new library, limited community support. 5. **Native JavaScript Implementation**: Using built-in JavaScript functions can be the most straightforward approach. Pros: no additional dependencies, high performance. Cons: may not offer as many features or flexibility as other libraries. **Libraries and Their Purposes** The benchmark includes four external libraries: 1. **Moment.js**: A widely-used library for working with dates and times in JavaScript. 2. **Luxon**: A modern, efficient library for handling dates and times, developed by the same team as Moment.js. 3. **Js-joda**: A Java-based library adapted for JavaScript, offering similar functionality to Joda-Time. 4. **Day.js**: A lightweight, fast library for working with dates and times. **Special JS Features or Syntax** None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax that require specific explanations. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries or implementations, consider: 1. **Date-fns**: Another popular library for date and time manipulation. 2. **Day.js alternatives**: Such as `date-fns` or ` moment-timezone`. 3. **Custom implementations**: Using JavaScript's built-in functions or creating your own custom implementation. Keep in mind that the choice of library ultimately depends on your specific requirements, performance needs, and personal preferences.
Related benchmarks:
date format
date to iso comparaison
luxon vs datefns vs moment-timezone
luxon vs datefns adding
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?