Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Reduce serialize vs JSON serialize
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
JSON serialize vs Reduce serialize
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.address1 = [{ childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }]; window.address2 = [{ childrenIndex: 1 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }]; window.serializeAddressJSON = (address) => JSON.stringify(address); window.serializeAddressReduce = (address) => address.reduce((serialized, point) => { const { childrenIndex, toggleIndex, instanceIndex } = point; let pointCode; if (childrenIndex !== undefined) { pointCode = `c${childrenIndex}`; } if (toggleIndex !== undefined) { pointCode = `t${toggleIndex}`; } if (instanceIndex !== undefined) { pointCode = `i${instanceIndex}`; } return `${serialized}${pointCode}`; }, '');
Tests:
JSON serialize
serializeAddressJSON(window.address1, window.address2)
Reduce serialize
serializeAddressReduce(window.address1, window.address2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON serialize
Reduce serialize
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
JSON serialize
1423722.4 Ops/sec
Reduce serialize
2802268.2 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to serializing data in JavaScript: 1. **JSON Serialize**: This approach uses the built-in `JSON.stringify()` method to serialize an object into a JSON string. 2. **Reduce Serialize**: This approach uses the Array.prototype.reduce() method to concatenate strings, where each string is generated based on the properties of the object. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: * JSON Serialize: Uses `JSON.stringify()` to serialize the data. * Reduce Serialize: Uses `Array.prototype.reduce()` to concatenate strings, generating a single string for each property in the object. **Pros and Cons** **JSON Serialize** Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * Fast and efficient Cons: * May not handle complex data structures or nested objects well * Can produce large JSON strings that may be difficult to parse **Reduce Serialize** Pros: * Can handle complex data structures and nested objects easily * Can generate a compact string representation of the data Cons: * More complex to understand and implement than JSON Serialize * May have performance issues if not implemented correctly **Library Used (JSON)** The `JSON` library is used for serializing data into a JSON string. This library provides a simple way to convert JavaScript objects into a format that can be easily parsed by humans or machines. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** This benchmark uses the `Array.prototype.reduce()` method, which is a built-in JavaScript function that applies a reduction operation to an array. It also uses template literals (`${serialized}${pointCode}`) to concatenate strings. These features are part of standard JavaScript syntax and are widely supported across different browsers and environments. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to serializing data in JavaScript include: * Using the `String.fromCharCode()` method to create a string from individual characters * Using a custom function to concatenate strings based on the properties of the object * Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js that provides utility functions for serializing data Overall, this benchmark provides a simple and concise way to compare two approaches to serializing data in JavaScript, making it easy for developers to understand and test their own serialization algorithms.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash isEqual vs serialize addresses
Lodash isEqual vs JSON serialize
Reduce serialize vs JSON serialize with replace
Reduce-based serialize vs JSON serialize
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?