Benchmark: Reduce serialize vs JSON serialize

Script Preparation code:

window.address1 = [{ childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }];
window.address2 = [{ childrenIndex: 1 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }];

window.serializeAddressJSON = (address) => JSON.stringify(address);
window.serializeAddressReduce = (address) =>
	address.reduce((serialized, point) => {
		const { childrenIndex, toggleIndex, instanceIndex } = point;

		let pointCode;
		if (childrenIndex !== undefined) {
			pointCode = `c${childrenIndex}`;
		}
		if (toggleIndex !== undefined) {
			pointCode = `t${toggleIndex}`;
		}
		if (instanceIndex !== undefined) {
			pointCode = `i${instanceIndex}`;
		}

		return `${serialized}${pointCode}`;
	}, '');

Tests:

JSON serialize
serializeAddressJSON(window.address1, window.address2)
Reduce serialize
serializeAddressReduce(window.address1, window.address2)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JSON serialize
Reduce serialize

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
JSON serialize	1423722.4 Ops/sec
Reduce serialize	2802268.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares two approaches to serializing data in JavaScript:

1. **JSON Serialize**: This approach uses the built-in `JSON.stringify()` method to serialize an object into a JSON string.
2. **Reduce Serialize**: This approach uses the Array.prototype.reduce() method to concatenate strings, where each string is generated based on the properties of the object.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares two options:

* JSON Serialize: Uses `JSON.stringify()` to serialize the data.
* Reduce Serialize: Uses `Array.prototype.reduce()` to concatenate strings, generating a single string for each property in the object.

**Pros and Cons**

**JSON Serialize**

Pros:

* Easy to understand and implement
* Fast and efficient

Cons:

* May not handle complex data structures or nested objects well
* Can produce large JSON strings that may be difficult to parse

**Reduce Serialize**

Pros:

* Can handle complex data structures and nested objects easily
* Can generate a compact string representation of the data

Cons:

* More complex to understand and implement than JSON Serialize
* May have performance issues if not implemented correctly

**Library Used (JSON)**

The `JSON` library is used for serializing data into a JSON string. This library provides a simple way to convert JavaScript objects into a format that can be easily parsed by humans or machines.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

This benchmark uses the `Array.prototype.reduce()` method, which is a built-in JavaScript function that applies a reduction operation to an array. It also uses template literals (`${serialized}${pointCode}`) to concatenate strings. These features are part of standard JavaScript syntax and are widely supported across different browsers and environments.

**Alternative Approaches**

Other approaches to serializing data in JavaScript include:

* Using the `String.fromCharCode()` method to create a string from individual characters
* Using a custom function to concatenate strings based on the properties of the object
* Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js that provides utility functions for serializing data

Overall, this benchmark provides a simple and concise way to compare two approaches to serializing data in JavaScript, making it easy for developers to understand and test their own serialization algorithms.

Related benchmarks:

Reduce serialize vs JSON serialize (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: JSON serialize vs Reduce serialize

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

JSON serialize

Reduce serialize

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):