Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Reduce serialize vs JSON serialize with replace
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
JSON serialize with replace vs Reduce serialize
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.address1 = [{ childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }]; window.address2 = [{ childrenIndex: 1 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }, { childrenIndex: 0 }, { toggleIndex: 1 }, { instanceIndex: 2 }]; window.serializeAddressJSON = ( address ) => { const stringifiedAddress = JSON.stringify(address); const shortenedAddress = stringifiedAddress .replace(/childrenIndex/g, 'c') .replace(/toggleIndex/g, 't') .replace(/instanceIndex/g, 'i'); return btoa(shortenedAddress); }; window.serializeAddressReduce = (address) => address.reduce((serialized, point) => { const { childrenIndex, toggleIndex, instanceIndex } = point; let pointCode; if (childrenIndex !== undefined) { pointCode = `c${childrenIndex}`; } if (toggleIndex !== undefined) { pointCode = `t${toggleIndex}`; } if (instanceIndex !== undefined) { pointCode = `i${instanceIndex}`; } return `${serialized}${pointCode}`; }, '');
Tests:
JSON serialize with replace
serializeAddressJSON(window.address1, window.address2)
Reduce serialize
serializeAddressReduce(window.address1, window.address2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
JSON serialize with replace
Reduce serialize
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and its test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains two key pieces of information: 1. **Name**: The name of the benchmark, which in this case is "Reduce serialize vs JSON serialize with replace". 2. **Script Preparation Code**: A JavaScript code snippet that sets up two variables `address1` and `address2`, which are used as inputs for the two test cases. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: ### 1. "JSON serialize with replace" This test case uses the `serializeAddressJSON` function, which serializes the input addresses using JSON.stringify() and then applies a series of regular expression replacements to shorten the string. The resulting shortened address is encoded using base64. **Pros:** * Simple to implement * Easy to understand **Cons:** * May not be as efficient as other methods due to the overhead of encoding and decoding data * Regular expression replacements can be computationally expensive ### 2. "Reduce serialize" This test case uses a reduce function, which concatenates the input addresses by replacing each property value with its corresponding abbreviation (e.g., `childrenIndex` becomes `c`, `toggleIndex` becomes `t`, and `instanceIndex` becomes `i`). The resulting concatenated string is then encoded using base64. **Pros:** * Can be more efficient than JSON serialization due to the absence of encoding and decoding overhead * Regular expression replacements are not required, making it potentially faster **Cons:** * Requires a good understanding of JavaScript's reduce function and regular expression replacements * May have performance issues if the input addresses are very large **Library Used** There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it can be inferred that `JSON.stringify()` and `btoa()` (base64 encoding) are part of the built-in JavaScript API. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The `serializeAddressReduce` function uses a reduce function, which is a built-in JavaScript feature. It also uses regular expression replacements to shorten the address string, but this is not specific to any particular syntax or library. **Other Alternatives** Some other approaches that could be used for serializing and encoding data include: * Using a custom-built serialization algorithm * Utilizing a dedicated library like Lodash or moment.js for serializing data * Implementing a more complex encoding scheme, such as Huffman coding or LZ77 compression However, the choice of approach depends on specific requirements, performance considerations, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
Test on isEqual performance with array of objects
Test on isEqual performance with array of objects and customiser
Array.every vs JSON.stringify
Lodash isEqual vs spread test
Compare Two Objects
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?