Benchmark: computed property names vs create, assign

Script Preparation code:

var lol = 'what'

Tests:

computed property names
var object = { [lol] : 'value' };
create, assign
var object = {}; object[lol] = 'value'

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
computed property names
create, assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its components.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that provides metadata about the test case. In this case, it contains:

* `Name`: The name of the benchmark, which is "computed property names vs create, assign".
* `Description`: An empty string, indicating that there's no detailed description provided.
* `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These fields contain JavaScript code that's executed before running the benchmark. In this case, both fields are empty, meaning that no script or HTML preparation is required.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark consists of two test cases:

1. **Computed Property Names**: This test case uses a variable `lol` and creates an object with a computed property name using bracket notation (`object[lol] = 'value'`).
2. **Create, Assign**: This test case also uses the same variable `lol`, but assigns a value to a non-computed property of an empty object (`object[lol] = 'value'`). The difference is that in this case, the property name is not computed.

**Library and Special Features**

There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript engines often use various optimizations and features that might affect the performance of these tests.

No special JS features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of two simple assignment patterns using computed property names versus non-computed property names.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the execution times of two approaches:

1. **Computed Property Names**: Using bracket notation (`object[lol] = 'value'`) to create an object with a computed property name.
2. **Create, Assign**: Assigning a value to a non-computed property of an empty object (`object[lol] = 'value'`).

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

* **Computed Property Names (Bracket Notation)**:
	+ Pros: Can be more readable and concise, as it avoids the need for explicit `this` keyword.
	+ Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the use of bracket notation, which can lead to slower performance.
* **Create, Assign**:
	+ Pros: Avoids the potential overhead of bracket notation and might be faster.
	+ Cons: Requires more code and may be less readable.

**Other Considerations**

When designing benchmarks like this one, consider the following:

* Ensure that the test cases are representative of real-world scenarios.
* Use a consistent set of variables and conditions to minimize variations in results.
* Test on multiple browsers and devices to ensure compatibility and fairness.
* Consider adding more test cases to cover different aspects of performance.

**Alternatives**

If you were to create an alternative benchmark, you might consider the following:

* Compare performance using other assignment patterns, such as dot notation (`object.lol = 'value'`) or the `Object.defineProperty()` method.
* Test the impact of different property types (e.g., numbers, strings, booleans) on performance.
* Include tests for more complex scenarios, like nested objects or arrays.

Keep in mind that benchmarking JavaScript performance can be challenging due to the many factors at play. It's essential to design and execute benchmarks carefully to ensure accurate and reliable results.

Related benchmarks:

computed property names vs create, assign (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: computed property names vs create, assign

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

computed property names

create, assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):