Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Dot property set notation VS Lodash.set (initial attribute existing 2)
(version: 0)
Compares different approaches to set an object property
Comparing performance of:
Dot notation property setter vs Lodash.set
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var person = { name: 'Foo', lastName: 'Bar', age: 0 };
Tests:
Dot notation property setter
_.set(person, 'age', 10)
Lodash.set
person.age = 10
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Dot notation property setter
Lodash.set
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark and explore what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents two test cases for measuring performance differences in setting object properties using different approaches: Lodash's `_.set` method and dot notation (`person.age = 10;`). **Approaches Being Compared** 1. **Lodash's `_set` Method**: This approach uses the Lodash library to set a property value on an object. 2. **Dot Notation**: This approach directly sets a property value using the dot notation syntax (e.g., `person.age = 10;`). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Lodash's `_set` Method**: * Pros: Convenient, concise way to set properties without manually creating getter/setter pairs. * Cons: Adds overhead due to the library's existence and additional function call. 2. **Dot Notation**: * Pros: Lightweight, native JavaScript syntax for setting properties, no added overhead. * Cons: Requires manual handling of property creation and updating. **Library Usage** In the benchmark, Lodash is used in its `4.17.5` version to provide the `_set` method. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None mentioned, but note that these approaches rely on standard JavaScript features (e.g., dot notation). **Other Considerations** * When setting properties directly using dot notation, you need to consider the impact of property creation and updating on performance. This might be more significant in complex object graphs. * If you frequently use library functions like `_set` for property updates, you may incur overhead from the library itself. **Alternatives** For simple property updates, dot notation is often preferred due to its native JavaScript syntax and lack of additional overhead. However, if you need a convenient way to set properties without manual getter/setter pairs, Lodash's `_set` method can be useful. Other alternatives include: * Directly using the `Object.defineProperty()` or `Object.set()` methods (if supported by your target browsers). * Creating a custom wrapper function around the property update logic. * Using a different library that provides similar functionality. For more detailed performance comparisons and benchmarking, you may also consider exploring other JavaScript engines, like V8 or SpiderMonkey, to see how they optimize these approaches.
Related benchmarks:
Dot property set notation VS Lodash.set
Dot property set notation VS Lodash.set poop
property assign VS Lodash.set
Dot property set notation VS Lodash.set (fix)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?