Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Js array test andrei
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
test 2 vs test 3
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
let arr = [];
Tests:
test 2
let arr = []; for(i=0; i<10; i++){ arr.push(i); }
test 3
let arr = []; for(i=0; i<10; i++){ arr[i] = i; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test 2
test 3
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark on MeasureThat.net compares two different ways to populate a JavaScript array with numbers from 0 to 9. **Test Case Descriptions:** * **Test "test 2":** Uses a `for` loop and the `push()` method to add each number to the end of the array. ```javascript let arr = []; // initialize an empty array for(i=0; i<10; i++){ // iterate from 0 to 9 arr.push(i); // add the current value 'i' to the end of the array } ``` * **Test "test 3":** Uses a `for` loop and direct indexing to assign values within the array. ```javascript let arr = []; for(i=0; i<10; i++){ arr[i] = i; // assign the current value 'i' at index 'i' in the array } ``` **Comparison and Considerations:** * **Performance:** The `push()` method, used in "test 2," is generally considered to be slower than direct indexing. This is because `push()` requires allocating new memory each time an element is added, while direct indexing directly modifies existing elements within the array. * **Array Memory Allocation:** Direct indexing ("test 3") can potentially lead to more efficient memory allocation as the array's size is known in advance. `push()` might involve resizing and copying data when the array exceeds its initial capacity. **Alternatives:** Besides these methods, JavaScript offers other ways to create arrays: * **Array constructor with values:** `let arr = new Array(10).fill(i)` * **Spread syntax:** `let arr = [...Array(10).keys()]` (generates a sequence of numbers) **Library Usage:** There are no libraries used in these benchmark tests. The provided code relies solely on built-in JavaScript functionality. Let me know if you have any more questions!
Related benchmarks:
Array clone
Spread Vs Unshift into new array
JS array emptiness check
Test array and unshift
array.length = 0 vs []
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?