Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
bench 2
(version: 0)
test 2
Comparing performance of:
case 1 vs case 2
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
case 1
const Offset = { 'America/Asuncion': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Asuncion', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Bogota': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Bogota', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Buenos_Aires': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Buenos_Aires', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Campo_Grande': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Campo_Grande', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Caracas': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Caracas', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Guayaquil': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Guayaquil', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Lima': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Lima', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Manaus': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Manaus', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Montevideo': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Montevideo', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Sao_Paulo': Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-GB', { timeZone: 'America/Sao_Paulo', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), } const timestamp = new Date(1653535260 * 1000) const parts = Offset['America/Sao_Paulo'].formatToParts(timestamp) const acc = parts.map((p) => { if (p.type === 'year') { return p.value } else { return '' } }).join('') + parts.map((p) => { if (p.type === 'month') { return p.value } else { return '' } }).join('') + parts.map((p) => { if (p.type === 'day') { return p.value } else { return '' } }).join('')
case 2
const Offset = { 'America/Asuncion': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Asuncion', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Bogota': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Bogota', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Buenos_Aires': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Buenos_Aires', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Campo_Grande': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Campo_Grande', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Caracas': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Caracas', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Guayaquil': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Guayaquil', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Lima': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Lima', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Manaus': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Manaus', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Montevideo': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Montevideo', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), 'America/Sao_Paulo': Intl.DateTimeFormat('fr-CA', { timeZone: 'America/Sao_Paulo', year: 'numeric', month: '2-digit', day: '2-digit' }), } const timestamp = new Date(1653535260 * 1000) const parts = Offset['America/Sao_Paulo'].format(timestamp) const acc = parts.split('-').join('')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
case 1
case 2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll do my best to explain the benchmark in detail. **Overview** The provided JSON represents two test cases, each measuring the performance of different approaches for formatting dates using the `Intl.DateTimeFormat` API. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is an object that contains metadata about the test case, such as its name and description. In this case, there are no script preparation or HTML preparation codes specified, which means that the tests only rely on JavaScript. **Options being compared** There are two main options being compared: 1. **Time Zone**: The first test case uses a time zone of `America/Sao_Paulo`, while the second test case uses a different time zone (not specified in the provided JSON). 2. **Language**: The first test case uses English (`en-GB`) as the language for formatting dates, while the second test case uses French Canadian (`fr-CA`). **Pros and Cons of each approach** **Using `America/Sao_Paulo` time zone:** * Pros: + Uses a specific time zone that is widely supported by browsers. + May provide more accurate results due to the use of a specific time zone. * Cons: + May not be relevant for all users, as different time zones have different date formatting rules. **Using `en-GB` language:** * Pros: + Widely supported by browsers and devices. + Provides a consistent date formatting style across different platforms. * Cons: + May not account for regional differences in date formatting (e.g., month-day-year vs. year-month-day). **Using `fr-CA` language:** * Pros: + Takes into account regional differences in date formatting (e.g., month-day-year). + Provides a more accurate representation of French Canadian date formatting rules. * Cons: + May not be supported by all browsers or devices. **Library and purpose** The `Intl.DateTimeFormat` API is part of the Internationalization API, which provides support for formatting dates and numbers in different languages and time zones. This library is used to format dates in a way that is consistent with regional differences in date formatting rules. **Latest benchmark result** The latest benchmark result shows the performance of each test case on a specific machine (Macintosh with Chrome 108). The results indicate that: * Test case 2, which uses `fr-CA` language and `America/Sao_Paulo` time zone, has an execution rate of approximately 618.22 executions per second. * Test case 1, which uses `en-GB` language and no specific time zone (implied by the lack of specification), has an execution rate of approximately 711.92 executions per second. Note that these results may vary depending on the machine and browser used for running the benchmark tests.
Related benchmarks:
soa vs aos
Lodash.get with instance default
Lodash.get with an instance default
Lodash isEqual vs native JS === for strings
ES6 Class vs Prototype vs Object Literal v3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?