Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.get with instance default
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
With new instance in get default vs Boolean logic
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var obj = { test: 123 }
Tests:
With new instance in get default
_.get(obj, 'test', new Set()); _.get(obj, 'missing', new Set());
Boolean logic
_.get(obj, 'test', false) || new Set(); _.get(obj, 'missing', false) || new Set();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
With new instance in get default
Boolean logic
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is represented by the "Script Preparation Code" and "Html Preparation Code". In this case: * The script preparation code defines a JavaScript object `obj` with a single property `test` set to 123. * The HTML preparation code includes a link to include the Lodash library (version 4.17.5) in the test environment. **Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two individual test cases: 1. **With new instance in get default**: This test case measures the performance of the `_.get()` function with an optional second argument set to a new Set instance, when trying to access a property that does not exist (`'missing'`). The test defines two invocations: * `_._get(obj, 'test', new Set())`: Accesses the `test` property of the object and creates a new Set instance. * `_._get(obj, 'missing', new Set())`: Tries to access the non-existent `'missing'` property and creates a new Set instance. 2. **Boolean logic**: This test case measures the performance of the `_.get()` function with optional boolean logic when trying to access a property that does not exist (`'missing'`). The test defines two invocations: * `_._get(obj, 'test', false) || new Set()`: Accesses the `test` property of the object and returns an empty Set if it doesn't exist. * `_._get(obj, 'missing', false) || new Set()`: Tries to access the non-existent `'missing'` property and returns an empty Set if it exists. **Lodash Library** The Lodash library is used in these test cases. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, dates, and more. In this case, the `_get()` function is used to access properties of objects. The library includes a variety of overloads for `_.get()`, including options for handling non-existent properties and creating new instances. **Options Compared** In these test cases: * **No instance creation**: Without creating a new Set instance (option 1) vs. with creating a new instance (option 2). * **Boolean logic**: Using the `||` operator to return an empty Set if it doesn't exist vs. using the `_get()` function directly. **Pros and Cons** * Creating a new Set instance for non-existent properties: + Pros: Returns a meaningful value, allowing for better error handling. + Cons: Can result in unnecessary memory allocation and potential performance overhead. * Boolean logic with `||` operator: + Pros: Simplifies the code, reduces readability concerns. + Cons: May not provide clear error messages or return values. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark environment uses Chrome 78 on a Mac OS X 10.14.6 device platform. * The test results are measured in executions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond). **Alternatives** If you were to rewrite these tests using alternative approaches, you might consider: * Using a different library or approach for creating new instances (e.g., `Array()` instead of `Set()`) * Implementing custom error handling mechanisms * Simplifying the code with other logical operators or expressions * Testing with different browser versions, device platforms, or operating systems
Related benchmarks:
circleTest
Last Lodash Test
Direct object access vs _.get
topkek
Direct object array access vs _.get
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?