Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Split Method vs Lodash (v4.17.21)
(version: 0)
Inspired by: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58702513/lodash-clone-array-vs-spread-operator#
Comparing performance of:
Split Method vs Lodash ToArray
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
const characters = 'AaBbCcDdEeFfGgHhIiJjKkLlMmNnOoPpQqRrSsTtUuVvWwXxYyZz1234567890'; const randomArr = []; for (let l = 0; randomArr.length < 500; l++) { randomArr.push( Array.from({ length: Math.floor(Math.random() * (16 - 2) + 2) }, (val, key) => characters[Math.floor(Math.random() * characters.length)], ).join('') ); } var str = randomArr.join(',');
Tests:
Split Method
str.split(',');
Lodash ToArray
_.toArray(str);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Split Method
Lodash ToArray
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 124 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Split Method
61608.8 Ops/sec
Lodash ToArray
258295.1 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark, "Split Method vs Lodash (v4.17.21)", compares the performance of two approaches to split a large string into an array: using the built-in `split` method versus the `_.toArray` function from the Lodash library. **Options Being Compared** 1. **Built-in `split` method**: This is the approach being tested by the first test case, "Split Method". The `split` method splits a string into an array of substrings based on a specified separator (in this case, a comma). 2. **Lodash _.toArray** function: This is the approach being tested by the second test case, "Lodash ToArray". The `_.toArray` function converts an object or a collection to an array. **Pros and Cons** **Built-in `split` method** Pros: * Fast and lightweight * Native implementation, unlikely to introduce additional overhead * Widely supported across browsers Cons: * Can be slow for large inputs due to the creation of intermediate arrays * May not perform well with complex separators or edge cases **Lodash _.toArray function** Pros: * High-performance implementation optimized for large inputs * Supports advanced features like `toString` and `filter` * Easy to use and readable code Cons: * Introduces additional overhead due to the external library * Requires an extra download (the Lodash library) * May not work in environments without the Lodash library installed **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like array manipulation, string formatting, and object transformation. The `_.toArray` function is part of this library and converts an object or collection to an array. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** None mentioned in the provided JSON. **Other Alternatives** If you need alternative approaches to split a large string into an array, consider: * Using a regex-based approach with `String.prototype.matchAll()` * Utilizing Web Workers for parallel processing * Leveraging modern JavaScript features like `Array.from()` and `map()` These alternatives may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and complexity.
Related benchmarks:
native slice vs lodash slice
native slice vs lodash slice 1M
native-slice-vs-chunk
native-splice-vs-chunk
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?