Benchmark: AAAAAAAAAA - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Tests:

Lodash
const ref = '{{adfhdufgjhdfghjksdf}}' function _isUnresolvedRef1(ref) { if (_.startsWith(ref, '{{') && _.endsWith(ref, '}}')) { return true; } else { return false; } } _isUnresolvedRef1(ref)
Vanilla
const ref = '{{adfhdufgjhdfghjksdf}}' function _isUnresolvedRef3(ref) { if(!ref) return false; return ref[0] === '{' && ref[1] === '{' && ref[ref.length - 1] === '}' && ref[ref.length - 2] === '}' } _isUnresolvedRef3(ref)
JS
const ref = '{{adfhdufgjhdfghjksdf}}' function _isUnresolvedRef3(ref) { if (!ref) return false; return (ref.toString().startsWith('{{') && ref.toString().endsWith('}}')) } _isUnresolvedRef3(ref)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Vanilla
JS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Overview of the Benchmark**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, where two different approaches are compared: Lodash and Vanilla (plain JavaScript). The benchmark aims to measure the performance of these two approaches in detecting unresolved references in a string.

**What is tested?**

The benchmark tests the execution speed of two functions:

1. `_isUnresolvedRef1` (Lodash): This function uses the `lodash.startsWith()` and `lodash.endsWith()` functions from the Lodash library to check if a given reference starts with `{{` and ends with `}}`.
2. `_isUnresolvedRef3` (Vanilla): This function uses conditional checks to verify if the reference starts with `{{`, ends with `}}`, and has two curly brackets (`{}`) in between.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares two approaches:

1. **Lodash**: Uses the Lodash library, which provides a set of helper functions for common tasks.
2. **Vanilla** (plain JavaScript): Does not use any external libraries or built-in functions, relying solely on basic JavaScript syntax and operations.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* **Lodash**:
	+ Pros:
		- Provides pre-built functions that are optimized for performance and robustness.
		- Reduces code duplication and makes the implementation more concise.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires an external library, which may introduce overhead or dependencies.
		- May not be as familiar to developers who are not accustomed to using Lodash.
* **Vanilla** (plain JavaScript):
	+ Pros:
		- Does not require any external libraries, making it more self-contained and lightweight.
		- Can be easier to understand and modify for developers who are familiar with plain JavaScript.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires manual implementation of the logic, which can lead to code duplication and potential errors.
		- May perform slower due to the absence of optimized built-in functions.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a set of pre-built functions for common tasks such as:

* String manipulation (e.g., `startsWith()`, `endsWith()`).
* Array operations (e.g., `forEach()`, `map()`).
* Object manipulation (e.g., `clone()`, `merge()`).

The Lodash library is widely used in the JavaScript community and provides a convenient way to perform common tasks without having to write custom code.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that would require specific knowledge or expertise. The implementation relies solely on basic JavaScript operations and conditional checks.

**Other alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options:

* **ES6 template literals**: You could use ES6 template literals to simplify the string manipulation logic. For example: `if (`{{ref}}`.startsWith('{{') && `{{ref}}`.endsWith('}}')) { ... }`
* **Regular expressions**: You could use regular expressions to achieve similar results as Lodash's `startsWith()` and `endsWith()` functions.
* **Other libraries or frameworks**: Depending on the specific requirements of your project, you might consider using other libraries or frameworks that provide optimized string manipulation or conditional check functionality.

Related benchmarks:

AAAAAAAAAA (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Vanilla vs JS

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Vanilla

JS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):