Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
bbqwezdfsdfdsf
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Constructor vs Number.parseInt() vs parseInt()
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Constructor
var nn = new Number('123');
Number.parseInt()
var nn = Number.parseInt('123');
parseInt()
var nn = parseInt('123');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Constructor
Number.parseInt()
parseInt()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Overview of the Benchmark** The provided benchmark measures the performance of creating and using the `Number` constructor versus using the `Number.parseInt()` method in JavaScript. **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests the following: * The `Number` constructor: Creating a new instance of the `Number` class with a string value. * `Number.parseInt()`: Converting a string to a number using this static method. These two approaches are compared in terms of their execution time and performance. **Comparison options** There are two comparison options: 1. **Constructor**: Using the `Number` constructor to create a new instance of the `Number` class with a string value. 2. **Number.parseInt()**: Using the `Number.parseInt()` method to convert a string to a number. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Constructor:** * Pros: + Can be used for more complex numerical operations that require a `Number` object. + Allows for more flexibility in creating custom numerical types. * Cons: + May have overhead due to the creation of a new instance. 2. **Number.parseInt():** + Pros: + Faster execution time since it's a static method on the `Number` prototype. + Can be used for simple numeric conversions. * Cons: + Limited to converting strings to numbers, which may not cover all use cases. **Other considerations:** * The benchmark does not consider other factors that might affect performance, such as the size of the input string or the specific JavaScript engine being used. * The benchmark does not account for any potential errors that might occur when using these methods (e.g., invalid input strings). **Library and syntax notes:** * No libraries are used in this benchmark. * There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned. **Alternative approaches:** Other alternatives to create numbers in JavaScript include: * Using the ` parseFloat()` method, which converts a string to a floating-point number. * Using the ` BigInt()` constructor, which creates a large integer value from a string. However, these methods are not directly comparable to the `Number` constructor and `Number.parseInt()`, as they have different use cases and performance characteristics.
Related benchmarks:
Hash Test
classcat, clsx, obj-str, vanilla
Random ID generate
deep copy test123
js compression (inflateRaw) libraries
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?