Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Random ID generate
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Crypto randomUUID vs generateUUID vs generateID
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.generateUUID = () => { return Math.random().toString(36).substring(2, 15) + Math.random().toString(36).substring(2, 15); }; window.generateID = (stringLength = 22) => { let randomStr = ""; const characters = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZqeytrpolkadjsghfgmnbzxcvnQPOWEYRKASJHDGFMNBCVX--___-_jsfhrlg-_124903564576986483658fgh4sdfh687e4h897WETHJ68F7G4688471877GFHJFFGJ87469857468746hfghwrtiyj4598yhdjkhgnk"; for (let index = 0; index < stringLength; index++) { randomStr += characters.charAt( Math.floor(Math.random() * characters.length) ); } return randomStr; };
Tests:
Crypto randomUUID
const uuid = crypto.randomUUID();
generateUUID
const uuid = generateUUID();
generateID
const uuid = generateID();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Crypto randomUUID
generateUUID
generateID
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of generating random UUIDs (Universally Unique Identifiers). The script defines two functions: `generateUUID` and `generateID`. Both functions are intended to generate random strings, but they use different approaches: 1. `generateUUID`: This function uses the `crypto.randomUUID()` method, which is a built-in function in Node.js that generates a cryptographically secure UUID. 2. `generateID`: This function generates a random string using a predefined character set and concatenates it with a random length. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares three different approaches: 1. **`crypto.randomUUID()`**: This method uses the `crypto` module to generate a cryptographically secure UUID. It is considered the most secure option. 2. **Custom `generateUUID` function**: This function generates a random string using a predefined character set and concatenates it with a random length. This approach is not as secure as the built-in `crypto.randomUUID()` method. 3. **Custom `generateID` function**: This function also generates a random string, but it uses a different character set and concatenation logic. **Pros and Cons** * **`crypto.randomUUID()`**: + Pros: Highly secure, cryptographically strong, and widely supported. + Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of cryptographic operations. * **Custom `generateUUID` function**: + Pros: More control over the generated string, potentially faster than `crypto.randomUUID()`. + Cons: Less secure, as the character set is not designed for cryptographically strong randomness. * **Custom `generateID` function**: + Pros: Similar to the custom `generateUUID` function, with more control over the generated string. + Cons: Even less secure than the custom `generateUUID` function. **Library and Purpose** The `crypto` module is a built-in JavaScript library that provides cryptographic functions, including the `randomUUID()` method. It is designed to generate cryptographically strong random numbers and UUIDs. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark. The focus is on measuring the performance of generating random UUIDs using different approaches. **Other Alternatives** If you want to measure the performance of generating random strings, you can also consider using: 1. `Math.random()` with a large character set: This approach generates a random string by concatenating characters from a predefined set. 2. `String.fromCharCode()` and `Math.random()`: This approach uses the `String.fromCharCode()` function to generate a random ASCII code and then converts it to a character. However, keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as secure or efficient as using the `crypto` module or implementing custom UUID generation functions specifically designed for this purpose.
Related benchmarks:
random id gen
Object.create(null) vs {} vs Map() key access (heavy)
Split vs Spread (randomized)
wdwdagserg
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?