Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Split VS URL
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Split vs Substring
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Split
var url = "https://proxy.projects.darwent.me/https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/search/recipes?q=chicken" var proxy = url.split(url.indexOf("/", 6))[1]
Substring
var url = "https://proxy.projects.darwent.me/https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/search/recipes?q=chicken" var proxy = url.substring(url.indexOf("/", 6), url.length)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Split
Substring
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for extracting a URL substring: `split` and `substring`. The goal is to measure the performance difference between these two methods on modern browsers. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark definition JSON provides basic information about the test. It's empty, but typically, it would include: * A brief description of the benchmark * Script preparation code (not applicable in this case) * HTML preparation code (not applicable in this case) **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Split**: This test case uses the `split()` method to extract the URL substring. ```javascript var url = "https://proxy.projects.darwent.me/https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/search/recipes?q=chicken" var proxy = url.split(url.indexOf("/\", 6))[1] ``` The `split()` method splits the string into an array of substrings, using the first occurrence of `/` at index 6 as the separator. The `[1]` index is used to extract the second element of the resulting array, which is the desired URL substring. 2. **Substring**: This test case uses the `substring()` method to extract the URL substring. ```javascript var url = "https://proxy.projects.darwent.me/https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/search/recipes?q=chicken" var proxy = url.substring(url.indexOf("/\", 6), url.length) ``` The `substring()` method extracts a portion of the string, starting at index 6 and ending at the end of the string (`url.length`). This effectively extracts the URL substring. **Libraries Used** None. Both tests only use built-in JavaScript methods: `split()` and `substring()`. **Special JavaScript Features or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax used in these test cases. They're straightforward, vanilla JavaScript implementations. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show the performance differences between the two approaches: 1. **Split**: Executions per second (EPS) = 690,231,744 2. **Substring**: EPS = 739,3337.5 These results indicate that the `substring()` method is slightly faster than the `split()` method in this specific benchmark. **Other Alternatives** For more advanced URL manipulation tasks, other alternatives might include: 1. `URL` API (modern browsers): Provides a more modern and efficient way to manipulate URLs. 2. Regular expressions: Can be used for more complex string matching and replacement scenarios. 3. String manipulation libraries like jQuery's `$.url()` or Lodash's `_.substring()`: Might provide additional features and optimizations. Keep in mind that the choice of alternative depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.
Related benchmarks:
Take last part from URL (Regex vs split)
Split vs Include
split vs regex onurl
substring then split v.s. split then shift
Regex vs Split and pop for capturing one section
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?