Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
substring then split v.s. split then shift
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
substring then split vs split then shift
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var uri = "/api/guilds/guildId/members/memberId";
Tests:
substring then split
uri.substring(5).split('/');
split then shift
uri.split('/').shift();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
substring then split
split then shift
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark test and its results. **What is tested:** The benchmark tests two approaches to splitting a URL string: 1. `uri.substring(5).split('/')`: This approach first extracts the substring starting from index 5 (skipping the first five characters of the original URL) and then splits it into an array using the `/` character as the separator. 2. `uri.split('/').shift()`: This approach first splits the original URL into an array using the `/` character as the separator, and then shifts one element off the beginning of the array ( effectively removing the first part of the URL). **Options compared:** The two approaches are being compared to determine which one is faster. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **`uri.substring(5).split('/')`**: * Pros: + More straightforward and intuitive approach. + May be more efficient if the substring starts at a fixed position (in this case, 5). * Cons: + Requires manual index selection, which can lead to errors or off-by-one issues. 2. **`uri.split('/').shift()`**: * Pros: + More concise and easy to read. + Shifts the first element, effectively removing it from the array, making it more suitable for URL parsing. * Cons: + Can be less efficient if the resulting array has a large number of elements. **Library usage:** None of the test cases use any libraries. The benchmark is testing only JavaScript core functionality. **Special JS feature or syntax:** The benchmark uses JavaScript's `shift()` method, which removes and returns the first element from an array. This is a standard JavaScript method, but it's not specifically tied to any particular version or syntax. **Other alternatives:** To implement this benchmark in other programming languages, you would need to: 1. Choose a URL parsing library (if needed). 2. Implement string splitting logic. 3. Use language-specific features for shifting elements from an array (e.g., `pop()` in Python). For example, in Python: ```python import re # equivalent to JavaScript's split('/') url = "/api/guilds/guildId/members/memberId" parts = url.split('/') # equivalent to JavaScript's shift() first_part = parts.pop(0) ``` Keep in mind that this is a simplified example and might not cover all edge cases. In summary, the benchmark tests two approaches to splitting a URL string using JavaScript core functionality. The `uri.substring(5).split('/')` approach requires manual index selection, while the `uri.split('/').shift()` approach uses language-specific features for shifting elements from an array.
Related benchmarks:
Slice/join vs Substr
Performance Test: substring vs substr vs slice vs split
split vs substring (11-11)
Array split, slice & join vs string substrings
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?