Benchmark: JQuery version speed test 9394963

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js'></script>
<script>
  var $jq1124 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
  var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div>
  <ul id="menu">
    <li class="menu-item">1</li>
    <li class="menu-item">2</li>
    <li class="menu-item">3</li>
    <li class="menu-item">4</li>  
  </ul>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
    $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({
      "background-color": "red"
    }).parent().css({
      "border": "1px solid blue"
    }).append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({
      "background-color": "green"
    })).end().end().remove();
  console.log('tests' + $);
}

Tests:

$jq1124
tests($jq1124);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
$jq1124
$jq224
$jq331

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into explaining the provided JSON benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The JSON provides a benchmark definition that represents a JavaScript microbenchmark. The benchmark is designed to test the performance of different jQuery versions (1.12.4, 2.2.4, and 3.6.0) by executing a specific script within each version.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code is a function `tests($) { ... }` that prepares the HTML document for benchmarking. The function uses jQuery to:

1. Find the second element with class "menu-item" (`$( ".menu-item" ).eq(2)`) and set its closest parent's background color to red.
2. Set the parent of the previous step's element's border to 1px solid blue.
3. Append a new paragraph element (`<p></p>`) with text "Text." and set its background color to green.
4. Remove the appended element.

The script also logs the name of the jQuery version used to execute the benchmark (e.g., `$jq1124`).

**Html Preparation Code**

The HTML preparation code is a snippet that includes multiple jQuery versions, along with their corresponding `noConflict()` function calls, which return alternative names for each jQuery version. This allows the benchmark to use different jQuery versions without conflicts.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are three individual test cases:

1. `$jq1124`: Tests jQuery 1.12.4.
2. `$jq224`: Tests jQuery 2.2.4.
3. `$jq331`: Tests jQuery 3.6.0.

Each test case executes the `tests($) { ... }` function with a different jQuery version.

**Pro and Cons of Different Approaches**

The benchmark uses three different jQuery versions, which can be considered as follows:

* **Pros of using multiple versions:**
	+ Allows for testing of different versions without conflicts.
	+ Provides insight into performance differences between versions.
* **Cons of using multiple versions:**
	+ Increased complexity due to the need to manage multiple versions and their dependencies.
	+ Potential performance overhead due to the use of multiple versions.

**Library and Its Purpose**

The `$.noConflict()` function is a part of jQuery that returns an alternative name for the current instance, allowing other libraries or code to use the original name without conflicts. In this benchmark, each jQuery version uses its own `noConflict()` function call to ensure compatibility with other scripts.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that require explicit mention.

**Other Alternatives**

If you were to recreate a similar benchmark, you could consider using:

* Other testing frameworks like Benchmark.js or jsbench
* Alternative libraries like Lodash or Underscore.js for functional programming tasks
* Different types of test cases, such as measuring the performance of specific algorithms or data structures

Keep in mind that creating an optimal benchmark requires careful consideration of factors like memory allocation, CPU utilization, and network latency, which may vary depending on your specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery version speed test 9394963 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: $jq1124 vs $jq224 vs $jq331

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

$jq1124

$jq224

$jq331

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):