Benchmark: jquery html text vs text

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Script Preparation code:

var d = "<p>test</p>";

Tests:

text
$('#foo').text(d);
html
$('#foo').html(d);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
text
html

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
text	972417.9 Ops/sec
html	531592.1 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that measures the performance of two different approaches: setting text content using `$('#foo').text(d)` versus setting HTML content using `$('#foo').html(d)`. The benchmark uses jQuery, which is a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines a string variable `d` containing the text to be used in the benchmark. In this case, the string contains a single paragraph with the text "test".

**Html Preparation Code**

The HTML preparation code includes a reference to jQuery (version 3.6.0) and an empty `<div>` element with an ID of "foo". This HTML will be used as the target element for the benchmark.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **"text"`**: This test case measures the performance of setting text content using `$('#foo').text(d)`. The expected behavior is to simply set the text content of the `<div>` element to "test".
2. **"html"`**: This test case measures the performance of setting HTML content using `$('#foo').html(d)`. The expected behavior is to set the inner HTML of the `<div>` element to the entire paragraph with the text "test".

**Pros and Cons**

* Using `text()` method:
	+ Pros: faster, as it only updates the text content without setting any HTML.
	+ Cons: might not work if you need to update other attributes or properties of the element.
* Using `html()` method:
	+ Pros: sets both the text content and HTML (if needed), can be useful for more complex updates.
	+ Cons: slower, as it needs to parse and set the entire HTML content.

**Library**

jQuery is a widely-used JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation. In this benchmark, jQuery is used to select elements by ID and update their properties (text or HTML).

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. The code is straightforward and uses standard JavaScript functions and libraries.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need to measure the performance of setting text content versus HTML content, there are other alternatives:

* Using vanilla JavaScript without jQuery: You can use `element.textContent` instead of `text()` and `innerHTML`.
* Using a different library or framework: Depending on your requirements, you might want to experiment with other libraries like React or Angular.
* Manual timing: If you don't need a microbenchmarking tool, you can manually measure the execution time using tools like Node.js's built-in timers.

Keep in mind that this benchmark is specifically designed for JavaScript and jQuery, so the alternatives mentioned above may not be directly applicable.

Related benchmarks:

jquery html text vs text (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: text vs html

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

text

html

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):