Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jquery html text vs text
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
text vs html
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script> <div id="foo">Hello World</div>
Script Preparation code:
var d = "<p>test</p>";
Tests:
text
$('#foo').text(d);
html
$('#foo').html(d);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
text
html
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
text
972K/s
html
532K/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
text
972,418 Ops/sec
html
531,592 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that measures the performance of two different approaches: setting text content using `$('#foo').text(d)` versus setting HTML content using `$('#foo').html(d)`. The benchmark uses jQuery, which is a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code defines a string variable `d` containing the text to be used in the benchmark. In this case, the string contains a single paragraph with the text "test". **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes a reference to jQuery (version 3.6.0) and an empty `<div>` element with an ID of "foo". This HTML will be used as the target element for the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"text"`**: This test case measures the performance of setting text content using `$('#foo').text(d)`. The expected behavior is to simply set the text content of the `<div>` element to "test". 2. **"html"`**: This test case measures the performance of setting HTML content using `$('#foo').html(d)`. The expected behavior is to set the inner HTML of the `<div>` element to the entire paragraph with the text "test". **Pros and Cons** * Using `text()` method: + Pros: faster, as it only updates the text content without setting any HTML. + Cons: might not work if you need to update other attributes or properties of the element. * Using `html()` method: + Pros: sets both the text content and HTML (if needed), can be useful for more complex updates. + Cons: slower, as it needs to parse and set the entire HTML content. **Library** jQuery is a widely-used JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation. In this benchmark, jQuery is used to select elements by ID and update their properties (text or HTML). **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. The code is straightforward and uses standard JavaScript functions and libraries. **Other Alternatives** If you need to measure the performance of setting text content versus HTML content, there are other alternatives: * Using vanilla JavaScript without jQuery: You can use `element.textContent` instead of `text()` and `innerHTML`. * Using a different library or framework: Depending on your requirements, you might want to experiment with other libraries like React or Angular. * Manual timing: If you don't need a microbenchmarking tool, you can manually measure the execution time using tools like Node.js's built-in timers. Keep in mind that this benchmark is specifically designed for JavaScript and jQuery, so the alternatives mentioned above may not be directly applicable.
Related benchmarks
jquery text vs html
jquery text vs js textContent
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?