Benchmark: jQuery ready vs none

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="#test-root"><div class="test-child"></div></div>

Tests:

self exec
(function(){ var test = new Array(); jQuery('#test-root .test-child').css('border', '1px solid red'); });
ready
jQuery( function() { var test = new Array(); jQuery('#test-root .test-child').css('border', '1px solid red'); });
none
var test = new Array(); jQuery('#test-root .test-child').css('border', '1px solid red');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
self exec
ready
none

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested in each benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark created on MeasureThat.net. A benchmark is a test that measures the performance of a specific piece of code or functionality.

In this case, we have three individual test cases:

1. **"jQuery ready vs none"**
This benchmark compares the execution time of two approaches:
	* `self exec`: The code executes immediately, without waiting for any external resources to be loaded.
	* `none`: The code does not use jQuery's `ready` event and instead relies on the browser's built-in timing mechanisms to determine when the page has finished loading.

**Options Compared**

The two options being compared are:

1. **Immediate execution (`self exec`)**: This approach executes the code immediately, without waiting for any external resources to be loaded.
2. **Delayed execution (`none`)**: This approach relies on the browser's built-in timing mechanisms to determine when the page has finished loading.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **`self exec`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Can provide more accurate results, as it executes immediately.
		+ Can be useful for code that needs to run quickly, such as games or high-performance applications.
	* Cons:
		+ May not account for external resources being loaded in the background, which could affect performance.
2. **`none`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Accounts for external resources being loaded in the background.
	* Cons:
		+ Can be slower due to the delay between execution and the point when the page has finished loading.

**Library and Purpose**

In this benchmark, the jQuery library is used to simplify the code and make it more concise. Specifically, the `ready` event is used to determine when the page has finished loading.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmarks. The focus is on comparing two different approaches to executing code.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring other alternatives, here are a few:

1. **Benchmarking libraries**: There are several benchmarking libraries available for JavaScript, such as Benchmark.js or BenchmarkSUITE.
2. **Web performance tools**: Tools like Chrome DevTools or Firefox's Performance Inspector can be used to measure the performance of web applications and identify areas for improvement.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different use cases and requirements than MeasureThat.net, which is specifically designed for microbenchmarking JavaScript code.

Related benchmarks:

jQuery ready vs none (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: self exec vs ready vs none

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

self exec

ready

none

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):